How to measure the instrument or test reliability

How to measure the instrument or test reliability

  1. Definition

       Reliability refers to the level of consistency of an instrument and the degree to which the same results are obtained when the instrument is used repeatedly with the same individuals or groups.[1] This consistency may be determined by using the same measure twice, administering two equivalent forms of the measure, or using a series of items designed to measure similar concepts. The symbol used to indicate the reliability level is r.

       Reliability refers to the consistency of measurement, that is, how consistent test scores or other assessment results are from one measurement to another.[2] A reliable test is consistent and dependable. If you give the same test to the same students, the test should yield similar results.[3]

2. Three Principle Types of Reliability

      a. Reliability as Stability

       In this form, reliability is a measure of consistency over time and over similar samples. A reliable instrument for a piece of research will yield similar data from similar respondents over time. In addition to stability over time, reliability as stability can also be stability over a similar sample.[4] For example, we would assume that if we were to administer a test or a questionnaire simultaneously to two groups of students who were very closely matched on significant characteristics (e.g. age, gender, ability etc. – whatever characteristics are deemed to have a significant bearing, on the responses), then similar results (on a test) or responses (to a questionnaire) would be obtained. The data for such assessments are created under test – retest conditions; that is, one observer rereads, recategorizes, or reanalyzes the same text, usually after some time has elapsed, or the same measuring device is repeatedly applied to one set of objects

b. Reliability as Equivalence (setara)

       Reliability may be achieved first through using equivalent forms (also known as alternative forms) of a test or data-gathering instrument.[5] If an equivalent form of the test or instrument is devised and yields similar results, then the instrument can be said to demonstrate this form of reliability. For example, the pretest and post-test in an experiment are predicated on this type of reliability, being alternate forms of instrument to measure the same issues. This type of reliability might also be demonstrated if the equivalent forms of a test or other instrument yield consistent results if applied simultaneously to matched samples (e.g. a control and experimental group or two random stratified samples in a survey). Second, reliability as equivalence may be achieved through inter-rater reliability. If more than one researcher is taking part in a piece of research then, human judgment being fallible, agreement between all researchers must be achieved, through ensuring that each researcher enters data in the same way.

c. Reliability as Internal Consistency

       An alternative measure of reliability as internal consistency is the Cronbach alpha, frequently referred to as the alpha coefficient of reliability, or simply the alpha. The Cronbach alpha provides a coefficient of inter-item correlations, that is, the correlation of each item with the sum of all the other relevant items, and is useful for multi-item scales. This is a measure of the internal consistency among the items (not, for example, the people).

3. Factors influencing Reliability measures

a. Number of Assessment Tasks

       In general, the larger the number of tasks on an assessment, the higher its reliability will be. This is because a longer assessment will provide a more adequate sample of the behavior being measured, and the scores are to be less distorted by chance factors, such as special familiarity with a given task or lack of understanding of what is expected on a given task.[6]

b. Spread of Scores

       The larger the spread of scores, the higher the estimate of reliability will be. Because larger reliability coefficients result when individual stay in the same relative position in a group from one assessment to another, it naturally follows that anything that reduces the possibility of shifting positions in the group also contributes to larger reliability coefficients.[7]

c. Objectivity

       The objectivity of an assessment refers to the degree to which equally competent scorers obtain the same results. Most standardized test of aptitude and achievement are high in objectivity. The test items are of the objective type (e.g., multiple choice), and the resulting scores are not influenced by the scores’ judgment or opinion.

d. Heterogeneity of the Group

       When the group used to derive the reliability estimate is heterogeneous with regard to the characteristic being measured (e.g., typing speed, achievement level, or attitudes toward corporal punishment), the variability of the test scores is higher and, consequently, the reliability is expected to be higher. Test manuals that report the test’s reliability are likely to include information on the groups used to assess the reliability.

e. Instrument Length

       As was mentioned before, all things being equal, a longer instrument is more reliable than a shorter instrument. In a shorter instrument, the probability of guessing the right answers is higher than in a long instrument. Therefore, creating a longer test can help provide a more stable estimate of the student’s performance. The split-half reliability, which uses the Spearman-Brown formula, demonstrates the effect of the test length on reliability. It shows that a full-length test is more reliable than a test that is half as long.

f. Difficulty of Items

       Tests that are too easy or too difficult tend to have lower reliability because they produce little variability among the scores obtained by the examinees. Tests where most of the items have an average level of difficulty tend to have higher reliability than tests where the majority of the items are very hard or very easy.

g. Quality of Items

       Improving the quality of items increases an instrument’s reliability. The process starts by writing clear, unambiguous items, providing good instructions for those administering and taking the test, and standardizing the administration and scoring procedures. Ideally, the instrument can then be field tested with a group similar to the one intended to take the test in the future. An item analysis can be performed to reveal weaknesses in the items and to help improve the test by reducing the error variance.[8]

4. Methods of Estimating Reliability

a. Test – retest Reliability

       The test-retest reliability is assessed by administering the same test twice to the same group of people. The scores of the examinees from the two testing sessions are correlated, and the correlation coefficient is used as the reliability index.[9] The time interval between the two testing sessions is important and should be reported along with the reliability coefficient. When the interval between the testing sessions is short, the reliability is likely to be higher than in cases when the interval between the testing sessions is long. The interval of time may be as short as one day or it can be as long as a year or more.[10] The score results between two testing can be correlated by using Pearson Product Moment.

b. Alternate Forms Reliability (Equivalent – form method)/Parallel Form

       The alternate forms reliability is obtained when a group of examinees is administered the two forms, and the two sets of scores (from the two test forms) are correlated with each other. The two forms of assessment are administered to the same group of students in close succession, and the resulting assessment scores are correlated. The two forms of the test should be equivalent in terms of their statistical properties (e.g., equal means, variances, and item intercorrelation), as well as the content coverage and the types of items used. The equivalent- forms method for estimating reliability uses two different but equivalent forms of an assessment (also called parallel form). Equivalent forms are built to the same set of specifications (e.g., test content and difficulty), but are constructed independently.

c. Internal Consistency Method (Tes tunggal)

       Internal consistency demands that the instrument or tests be run once.

1). The Split – half method (metode belah dua)

       In the split-half method, the test is split into two halves and the scores of the examinees on one half are correlated with their scores on the other half.[11] Each half is considered an alternate form of the test. The most common way to split a test is to divide it into odd and even items, although other procedures that create two similar halves are also acceptable. These two halves may differ in terms of content coverage, item difficulty, and students’ level of fatigue and practice. To use the split-half approach, items on the test should be scored dichotomously, where a correct answer is assigned 1 point and a wrong answer is assigned 0 points. In order to calculate the reliability for a full-length test, the Spearman-Brown prophecy formula is used. This formula uses the reliability obtained for the half length test to estimate the reliability of a full-length test. The Spearman-Brown prophecy formula is:

2). Kuder – Richardson Method

F. Kuder and M. W. Richardson developed a series of formulas in an article published in 1937. Two of these formulas, KR-20 and KR-21, are used today to measure agreement, or intercorrelation, among test items. As with the split-half method, these procedures can only be used for items that are scored dichotomously (right or wrong). KR-20 can be thought of as the average of all possible split-half coefficients obtained for a group of examinees. KR-21 is easier to compute, but it is appropriate only when the level of difficulty of all items is similar, a requirement that is not easily satisfied.

2). Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha

       Coefficient alpha can be used for tests with various item formats. For example, it can be applied to instruments that use a Likert scale, where each item may be scored on a scale of one to five (1-5). Coefficient alpha measures how well items or variables that measure a similar trait or concept correlate with each other and it is considered by researchers to provide good reliability estimates in most situations. The formula is

d. Inter – rater Reliability

       Inter-rater reliability refers to the degree of consistency and agreement between scores assigned by two or more raters or observers who judge or grade the same performance or behavior.[12] For example, the process of scoring essay tests or observing and rating behaviors calls for subjective decisions on the part of those who have to grade the tests or rate the behaviors. Essays may be assessed using rubrics that include criteria such as content, organization, syntax and grammar, completeness, and originality. To assess the reliability of the essay-scoring process and the criteria used for grading, the essays first are read by two or more readers who assign a score on each criterion using a rating scale. The scores assigned by the scorers on the different criteria are then evaluated to see if they are consistent.

5. The Standard Error of Measurement

       The reliability and accuracy of a test can be expressed in terms of the standard error of measurement (SEM). The standard error of measurement provides information about the variability of a person’s scores obtained upon repeated administrations of a test.[13] The standard error of measurement is especially suitable for the interpretation of individual scores. Since measures of human traits and behaviors contain an error component, any score obtained by such a measure is not a completely accurate representation of the person’s true performance, and the standard error of measurement allows us to estimate the range of scores wherein the true score lies.

6. How high should Reliability be?

       Usually, self-made instruments, such as those created by classroom teachers, tend to have lower reliability levels than tests prepared by commercial companies or by professional test writers.[14] Teachers and other practitioners may not have the time or the expertise to construct the tests, and they may not perform an item analysis or revise the items where needed. Another point to keep in mind is that tests that measure the affective domain tend to have lower reliability levels than tests that measure the cognitive domain. The main reason for this phenomenon is that the affective domain behavior is less consistent than the cognitive domain behavior.

REFERENCES

Cohen, Louis; Manion, Lawrence; dan Morrison, Keith. 2007. Reserach Methods in Education. New York: Routledge.

Miller, M. David. 2009. Measurement and Assessment in Teaching. USA: Pearson Education, Ltd.

Ravid, Ruth. 2011. Practical Statistics for Educators. USA: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

  1. Huck, Schuyler. 2012. Reading Statistics and Research. USA: Pearson.

       [1] Ruth Ravid, Practical Statistic, (USA: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc, 2001), 192.

       [2] David Miller, Measurement and Assessment in Teaching, (USA: Pearson Education, Ltd, 2009), 107.

       [3] Douglas Brown, Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices, (California: Longman, 2003), 20.

       [4] Louis Cohen, Research Methods in Education, (New York: Routledge, 2007), 146.

       [5] Ibid,.147.

       [6] David Miller, Measurement and Assessment in Teaching, 125.

      [7] Ibid,.126

       [8] Ruth Ravid, Practical Statistic, 199.

       [9] Ibid,.193.

       [10] Schuyler W. Huck, Reading Statistics and Research, (USA: Pearson, 2012), 69.

      [11] Ruth Ravid, Practical Statistic, 195.

      [12] Ibid,.196.

      [13] Ibid,.197.

      [14] Ibid,.199.

Meneladani Sifat Nabi Muhammad SAW di Era Modern

Meneladani Sifat Nabi Muhammad SAW di Era Modern

 

Jama’ah shalat subuh yang dirahmati Allah…

Di zaman modern seperti ini, kita seyogyanya menjaga akhlaqul karimah kita, karena akhlaqlah yang menentukan baik buruknya tinkah laku kita di depan orang lain ,bahkan di mata Allah SWT sekalipun. Akhlaq merupakan kunci utama untuk hidup bahagia di dunia, karena dengan akhlaq lah kita bisa dituntun sekaligus dibimbing ke jalan yang benar tentunya sesuai dengan syari’at islam. Pada zaman modern ini, tidak menutup kemungkinan kita tidak bisa lari dari budaya Barat yang telah masuk ke peradaban islam dengan berbagai cara baik melalui teknologi, fashion, bahkan yang lebih heboh lagi adalah lifestyle (gaya hidup). Banyak dikalangan remaja telah terpengaruh oleh gaya hidup mereka, begitu juga dengan gaya berpakaian yang tidak sesuai dengan syariat islam (menutup aurat). Islam telah mewajibkan menutup aurat baik laki-laki dan perempuan dimana saja, karena dengannya, manusia bisa menjaga hawa nafsu mereka satu sama lain. Disisi lain, anak remaja zaman sekarang lebih mengutamakan bermain bersama teman dengan begadang, nongkrong di kafe, bahkan narkobapun mereka gunakan demi melampiaskan kesenangan mereka dari pada menghidupkan qiyamul lain (shalat malam) di malam hari, membaca Al-Qur’an, shalat sunnah, dan lain-lain. Budaya barat telah merusak moral mereka.

Jama’ah shalat subuh yang dirahmati Allah…

Untuk mengatasi itu semua, kita sebagai umat muslim seyogyanya melihat kebelakang sifat Rasulullah SAW, dengan meneladani sekaligus mempraktikan perilaku, tindak tanduk beliau dalam kehidupan kita sekarang ini. Dengan itu, kita bisa meminimalisir budaya barat yang negatif. Banyak Hadits sekaligus ayat Al-qur’an yang telah menjelaskan sekaligus mengupas tuntas tentang sifat Rasulullah dan pahala atau ganjaran bagi mereka (makhluq) yang meneladani sifat beliau. Dalam Hadist beliau, beliau Kanjeng Nabi SAW berkata :

اِنَّمَا بُعِثْتُ لِاُتَمِّمَ مَكَا رِمَ اْلاَ خْلَا قَ

Artinya : Sesungguhnya aku diutus untuk menyempurnakan akhlaq yang mulia.

Hadist ini menjelaskan kepada kita bahwa Nabi SAW diutus oleh Allah untuk menyempurnakan akhlaq yang mulia, karena pada saat itu kemaksiatan meraja lela, kemungkaran terjadi dimana-mana, oleh sebab itu Allah SWT mengutus beliau untuk menyadarkan umat manusia akan perbuatan mereka selama ini. Allah juga berfirman dalam Surah Al-Ahzab ayat 21 yang berbunyi:

لَقَدْ كَانَ لَكُمْ فِي رَسُولِ اللهِ أُسْوَةٌ حَسَنَةٌ لِمَنْ كَانَ يَرْجُو اللهَ وَالْيَوْمَ الْآخِرَ وَذَكَرَ اللهَ كَثِيرًا 

Artinya : “Sesungguhnya telah ada pada (diri) Rasulullah SAW itu suri tauladan yang baik bagimu (yaitu) orang-orang yang mengharap (rahmat) Allah dan (kedatangan) hari kiamat dan dia banyak menyebut Allah.

Pada ayat diatas, jelas sekali bahwa Rasulullah SAW adalah sosok Nabi yang mempunyai sifat, suri tauladan yang baik dan mulia. Ini semua bisa dilihat dari empat sifat yang dimiliki Rasulullah SAW. Pertama, As-Siddiq yang berarti jujur, benar, tidak berbohong. Benar disini diartikan sebagai benar ucapanya yang sesuai dengan keadaan yang sebenarnya (realita). Kedua, Amanah yang berarti dapat dipercaya perbuatanya. Melaksanakan juga yang dipercayakan kepadanya, menyampaikan dan menjaga apapun yang dipercayakan kepadanya. Sifat yang ketiga yaitu Fathonah yang berarti cerdas. Setiap orang telah diberi kecerdasan oleh Allah SWT yang berbeda-beda antara satu sama lain. Keempat, Tabligh yang artinya menyampaikan wahyu kepada umatnya. Wahyu adalah petunjuk yang benar yang menjadi landasan hidup kita dan membimbing kita dalam mencapai kebahagiaan yang haqiqi. Dalam surah An – Najm ayat 3-4 disebutkan :

وَمَا يَنطِقُ عَنِ الْهَوَى إِنْ هُوَ إِلَّا وَحْيٌ يُوحَى

Artinya : “Dan tidaklah yang diucapkannya itu, menurut kemauan hawa nafsunya. Ucapannya itu tiada lain hanyalah wahyu yang diwahyukan (kepadanya).

Seyogyanya setelah kita tau Hadist dan ayat diatas, kita bisa meneladani sekaligus mengimplikasikan pada kehidupan yang modern ini, sehingga iman kita tidak mudah tergoyahkan oleh kehidupan yang keras ini.

Allah telah menjanjikanya pada kita pada Surah An Nisaa ayat 80 yang berbunyi :

مَّنْ يُطِعِ الرَّسُولَ فَقَدْ أَطَاعَ اللّهَ

Artinya : “Barang siapa yang mentaati Rasul itu, sesungguhnya ia telah menaati Allah”.

Disisi lain Rasulullah juga bersabda:

 كُلُّ أُمَّتِى يَدْخُلُونَ الْجَنَّةَ ، إِلاَّ مَنْ أَبَى » . قَالُوا : يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَمَنْ يَأْبَى قَالَ : « مَنْ أَطَاعَنِي دَخَلَ الْجَنَّةَ ، وَمَنْ عَصَانِي فَقَدْ أَبَى

Artinya: “Setiap ummatku akan masuk surge kecuali yang enggan. (Lalu) dikatakan kepada beliau: Siapa yang enggan itu wahai Rasulullah? Maka beliau menjawab : “Barang siapa mentaati aku ia pasti masuk surge, dan barang siapa yang mendurhakaiku maka ia enggan (masuk surga). (Shohih Bukhori : 7280)

Selain kita meneladani sifat beliau, kita juga diperintahkan untuk mengikuti wahyu yang diturunkan Allah kepada Rasulullah, seperti yang tertuang dalam Al-Qur’an Surah Al-‘Araf: 3 yang berbunyi:

اتَّبِعُوا مَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْكُمْ مِنْ رَبِّكُمْ وَلَا تَتَّبِعُوا مِنْ دُونِهِ أَوْلِيَاءَ ۗ قَلِيلًا مَا تَذَكَّرُونَ

Artinya: Ikutlah apa yang diturunkan kepadamu dari Rabb-mu, dan janganlah kamu mengikuti pemimpin-pemimpin selainya. Amat sedikitlah kamu mengambil pelajaran (dari padanya).

Jama’ah shalat subuh Rahimakumullah…..

Begitu mulianya akhlaq Rasulullah yang dapat kita jadikan sebagai teladan hidup. Tetapi masih banyak pelajaran yang dapat kita ambil dari sifat beliau yang sampai-sampai beliau mendapat gelar Al-Amin (dapat dipercaya) dan Al-Maksum (terhindar dari dosa). Nabi Muhammad SAW adalah seorang Nabi yang ma’sum, tapi disisi lain beliau tidak henti-hentinya untuk selalu memohon ampun (beristigfar) kepada Allah jika beliau melakukan kesalahan pada diri beliau. Tidak seperti kita ini, yang bertaubat, hanya ketika kita mendapati kesalahan dan dosa, menunggu kita melakukan dosa pada orang lain. Begitu mulianya sifat Kanjeng Nabi SAW. Semoga diakhir zaman ini kita tetep selalu istiqomah mengikuti sunnah-sunnah beliau dan mengimplikasikan sifat beliau pada kehidupan sehari-hari.amiin.

Age Factor in the Second Language Acquisition (SLA)

Age Factor in the Second Language Acquisition (SLA)

Age emerges as a remarkable site of difference between L2 and L1 acquisition. Perhaps, for this reason, understanding the relationship between age and L2 acquisition has been a central goal since the inception of the field of SLA. Two issues are hotly debated. One pertains to the possibility that a biological schedule may operate, after which the processes and outcomes of L2 acquisition are fundamentally and irreversibly changed. This is also known as the Critical Period Hypothesis (CPH) in L2 learning. The other issue relates to the possibility that there may be a ceiling to L2 learning, in the sense that it may impossible to develop levels of L2 competence. The main terms related to age in SLA include: (1) Critical Period Hypothesis (CPH) (2) SLA research background to the critical period hypothesis (3) Age and L2 Morphosyntax (4) Age and L2 phonology.

  1. Critical Period Hypothesis (CPH)

The critical Period Hypothesis (CPH) was first proposed by Montreal neurologist Wilder Penfield and co-author Lamar Roberts in 1959 with their book “Speech and Brain Mechanism”. It also popularized by Eric Lenneberg 1967 with his famous book “Biological foundations of language”. Lenneberg (1967), who is generally acknowledged as the ‘father’ of the CPH in relation to language acquisition, sees the critical period as beginning at age two and ending around puberty, this period coinciding with the lateralization process. But, according to Ellis, the term ‘critical period’ is used to refer to the general phenomenon of declining competence over increasing age of exposure and is used to state that there is a period when language acquisition can take place naturally and effortlessly, but after a certain age the brain is no longer able to process language input in this way.

The most frequently understood period referred to is reflected in Scovel’s definition proposing that in brief, the critical period hypothesis is the notion that language is best learned during the early years of childhood, and that after about the first dozen years of life, everyone faces certain constraints in the ability to pick up a new language.

Sometimes the adjectives “optimal” and “sensitive” are used as well as “critical” in the literature. The slight contradiction is solved by Scovel’s suggestion that the first 15 or so years of life is a ‘sensitive’ period for language acquisition in general, whereas the same period should be identified as ‘critical’ for speech, as in his view only speech is constrained, and other aspects of language (e.g. vocabulary and syntax) are free from any ultimate learning limits.

Lenneberg cites some evidence based partly on his own observations of deaf children. He claims that whereas ‘children deafened before completion of the second year do not have any facilitation (in speech of oral skills) in comparison with the congenitally deaf, those who lose their hearing after having been exposed – even for a short time – to the experience of oral language subsequent to this point ‘can be trained much more easily in all the oral language arts. He interprets this as indicating that the beginning of the CP can be located around the age of two years.

In the other hand, the critical period issue has attracted interest from researchers, and while some argue that even its existence is controversial, others try to prove its effects. Three different standpoints can be identified in the literature to illustrate the controversy. The first position states that only children can attain native-like pronunciation in SLA; the second finds that data are ambiguous: one can say that there is some good supportive evidence and that there is no actual counterevidence. The third position denies the existence of the critical period and states that the learning situation in combination with age-related affective and cognitive factors could account for some of the variation in success between child and adult L2 learning. Because some researchers deny the existence of CPH only focus on age in acquiring L2, explanations for the existence of a critical period in SLA have focused on roughly four theoretical perspectives: (1) Neurolinguistic explanation (2) Cognitive Explanation (3) Social-psychological explanation (4) linguistic explanation

a. Neurolinguistic explanation

This term first are proposed by Penfield and Robert. Their idea quickly became influential in a time when the new field called SLA was emerging. These authors contributed neurolinguistic data supporting a natural predisposition in the child’s brain for learning the L1. Penfield and Roberts (1959) argue that the child’s greater ability to learn a language was explained by the greater plasticity of its brain. The evidence cited referred to the child’s capacity to recover after injury of the speech areas of the left hemisphere, whereas adults often did not recover normal speech. Lenneberg (1967) also argued that the left and right hemispheres of the human brain become specialized for different functions roughly between the age of two and puberty. This process is called lateralization, and according to the hypothesis, the end of lateralization coincides with the child’s puberty, after which language acquisition becomes more problematic.

b. Cognitive explanation

       The most frequently mentioned cognitive explanation for child and adult differences is the onset of Piaget’s formal operation stage. Three broad approaches are outlined by Singleton (1989), which seeks to account for the critical period in Piagetian terms:

  • The first sees the emergence of language as dependent on cognitive growth;
  • The second accepts the notion of a decline in language learning capacity after puberty;
  • The third one argues for the advantage of the greater cognitive maturity.

A similar cognitive explanation is provided in Wong Fillmore’s (1991) SLA model, as she claims that two types of mechanisms figure in SLA: the LAD-type mechanism together with general cognitive skills. Children have more access to the first type, whereas with the advance of age general cognitive mechanisms are more heavily involved in SLA. Larsen-Freeman and Long (1991, p.163) characterize the same process as a ‘trade-off’: adults benefit by the ability to think abstractly in the areas of problem solving, but at the same time lose their ability to make use of the LAD for SLA.

c. Social-psychological explanation

       The sociolinguistic arguments for the existence of the critical period in SLA focus on the role of attitudes and peer pressure. According to these explanations, young children are not developed enough cognitively to possess attitudes toward races, cultures and languages, as ‘most of these attitudes are ‘taught’, consciously or unconsciously, by parents, other adults, and peers’ (Brown, 1987, p. 51). A similar explanation can be drawn from Schumann’s Acculturation/Pidginization Model (1978; 1990) states that success in SLA depends on the extent and quality of contact between the learner and the target language culture, which in turn depends on the degree of social and psychological distance between the learner and the language and culture

d. Linguistic explanation

       The linguistic explanations concerning the age factor focus on differences in the input children and adults experience during SLA. One of these arguments claims that children typically engage in different kinds of interaction than adults. Some researchers say that children get more ‘here and now’ and less complex input than adults (Hatch: 1978), while others argue that older learners have an advantage as they are better at obtaining appropriate input. The amount of input is also claimed to be larger for children in research based on the distinction between ‘age of arrival’ and ‘length of residence’ in the host environment

      So far we have considered neuro-biological, cognitive, socio-psychological, and linguistic explanation for child/adult differences. The picture is complex and blurred: there seems to be insufficient evidence for the existence of a CP for SLA, but the general claim that children are better at SLA in the long run seems to be supported.

2. SLA Research Background to the CPH

a. The younger the better

It reflects the strong version of the hypothesis by positing that the younger learners are more efficient and successful than older learners and puberty marks the onset of a decline in SLA capacity. Singleton reviews 15 different studies that support ‘the younger the better’ position. Three of the studies in his review are based on research on instructed FLL and the others were conducted in the host environment. The children involved in these ‘naturalistic’ studies started school in the target language and were exposed to language among peers all day and they typically developed native-like pronunciation and proficiency.

b. The older the better

The second standpoint, ‘the older the better’, states just the opposite of the first one: older language learners are more successful and efficient than younger children. The position is supported by three types of studies: (1) studies based on experimental formal instruction; (2) studies on primary school second language teaching programmes, and (3) second language immersion programmes.

c. The younger the better in some areas

The third position assumes that children are better than adults only in certain areas of SLA: at acquiring accent and basic interpersonal communication skills. The strong version of this hypothesis states that an authentic accent is not available unless SLA begins before the critical age (the ‘Joseph Conrad phenomenon). Scovel (1988) goes on to assume that there are a few adult exceptions to my claim that people cannot pass themselves off as native speakers if they have acquired a language after puberty, even though there is no empirical evidence that such individuals exist. Singleton (1989) reexamines the studies that indicated greater success for younger learners on phonetic/phonological performance and points out that even in studies which seem to indicate that younger learners acquire native accent the evidence is for a trend rather than for a rule.

d. The younger the better in the long run

The supporters of this position state that children appear to be much more successful than adults in acquiring the phonological system of the target language, and many of them eventually attain native-like accents. Most children are ultimately more successful than adults in SLA, but they are not always faster. Adults appear to progress faster than children in the areas of syntax and morphology, at least in the early stages of the process (Dulay et al 1982 pp 94-95).

  1. Age and L2 Morphosyntax

      Ultimate attainment is usually measured by comparing L2 learner’s responses on grammatically judgement tasks along differing arrival age and against a native speaker baseline. The accumulated findings suggest that learners who began acquiring the L2 before a certain age, which these studies locate to be around puberty, will tend to exhibit intuitions that are very close to those of native speakers of that language. For a decade now, the new field of cognitive neuroscience has contributed interesting evidence on the issue. The data are elicited with neuroimaging techniques such as event-related potentials, which offer excellent temporal resolution and make it possible to measure in milliseconds the activation patterns of neural networks involved in different cognitive operations while the brain is processing language stimuli. The converging findings favor a critical period interpretation for L2 morphosyntax.

  1. Age and L2 Phonology

      Tom Scovel states that speech has a special status when it comes to critical periods because ‘pronunciation is the only part of language which is directly “physical” and which demands neuromuscular programming’. For example one-third (1/3) of the human brain’s cortex is dedicated to controlling motor skills in the lower face, lips, tongue and throat, all involved in the production of speech. According to Flege, phonetic categories or mental representations of speech sounds in the L1 are stabilized by age five to seven. After that point, new phonetic contrasts will be processed through such an L1 filter, and hence it is more difficult, although not biologically impossible, to detect and produce L2 categories that are not salient.

 

 

Essay about football game

Football Game: The Profitable Future Investment

 

      Why do some people like playing football? Why do most people spend their more time only to play football? What are interesting things got from playing football? The answers to these questions are complex. Most people have a different answer to respond it. People who like playing football undoubtly say that football is enjoyable game. On the other hand, people who extremely dislike playing football say that football only makes the body become hurt. There are some wise words said by the best player in the world such as Cristiano Ronaldo. He says, “There is no harm in dreaming of becoming the world’s best player. It is all about trying to be the best. I will keep working hard to achieve it but it is within my capabilities”. Zlatan Ibrahimovic also says, “One thing is for sure, a World Cup without me is nothing to watch so it is not worthwhile to wait for the World Cup.” These quotations draw that football is seen as a thing made someone become familiar in the world and society exactly. It’s just one of the advantages got from playing football, besides there are also still a lot of profits got from playing football: bringing the country becomes rich and prosperous, the inter-world relation becomes solid, the world peace becomes better and the unemployment in the world will be less.

      Firstly, football game can make the country become rich and prosperous. Undoubtedly, all countries get many incomes from football game, because each club must give the tax to the government. For instance, when broadcast right is fought by several broadcasts and advertisement setter is ready to pay, the football industry may develop rapidly. Then, when the football infrastructure begins to be interested by investor and club, so that the country or region can build the stadium itself. Indeed, when the units of football supporting service such as agency and football academy and the work of football requirement maker is increasingly expanding, consequently the football industry is more recognized and potentially gives many significant contributions to the region and nation economy. In the football industry, the state income is not only from players but also from club units.

      Secondly, football game can build the solid and good inter-world relation. For example, when Indonesia competes in ASEAN competition, especially in football game, indirectly Indonesia has made a relation among the countries. The presidents are automatically bound by this competition. They can meet one another in meeting to negotiate some statements to get the best decision in this competition. Each state sends its club to match in the champion game such as AFF Cup in Asia, champion league in Europe, even in the World Cup.

     Thirdly, football game has brought the world peace. During the First and Second World War, the country had got many disadvantages, especially in infrastructure and economy field. Most people cannot be calm because of many bombs attacking them. The relationship done by people becomes less and apprehensive, but after the football tournament is held in many countries, the situation and condition becomes different than before. Most of the states make an agreement and decision to hold competition which can change the country economically and socially. Nowdays, FIFA is the center even the leader of this large exhibition in the football game deciding and arranging the football schedule as well as the cup. Gradually, a lot of people will be enthusiasm when they directly watch  in the field. They respect among the other persons in the stadium. They can know the foreign people from many countries, so that no dissension occurs in the world. Instead, they will create good relation to support the football game.

      Fourth, football game can reduce the unemployment rate in the world. Football has changed the people future and philosophy of life. Surely, people who has hobby such as football, they can easily and quickly get job in football club. They will be recruited by football management quickly. They will earn much money if they play well in the field such as Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi. This should be certainly supported by the interest and talent. It’s different between the player who is as a striker and back. Obviously, the player who is as a striker gets much money because they have the hard job. They must make many goals in order to bring their club get victory. If they can do it, definitely the manager of club will pay them much.

     It seems clear that the football game has brought many positive effects in many sides, especially for developing the countries. Besides, it can change philosophy of life in the world.

CONTOH PROPOSAL PENELITIAN KUALITATIF

 

 

PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN MENYIMAK DENGAN PENDEKATAN PENGAJARAN BAHASA KOMUNIKATIF (CLT) PADA KELAS X DI SMA NEGERI 1 PONOROGO

BAB 1

PENDAHULUAN

 

  1. Latar Belakang Masalah

 

      Di dalam pembelajaran bahasa Inggris di SMA, pendekatan pembelajaran merupakan salah satu faktor yang sangat penting bagi seorang guru ketika mengajar. Tetapi faktanya masih ditemukan guru yang belum mengerti dan melaksanakan pembelajaran dengan menggunakan pendekatan yang sesuai dengan tujuan pembelajaran. Pendekatan masih berpusat pada guru yaitu ceramah, sehingga murid masih bersifat pasif. Interaksi dan komunikasi antara guru dan murid masih kurang terjalin. Sebab lain dapat dikarenakan penerapan pendekatan CLT belum sesuai dengan kurikulum. Bertolak dari pernyataan di atas, penelitian ini menekankan pada usaha pengumpulan informasi sejauh mana pendekatan pengajaran bahasa komunikatif (CLT) dilaksanakan dalam pembelajaran bahasa Inggris khususnya pada pembelajaran menyimak.

  1. Identifikasi Masalah

      Berdasarkan latar belakang masalah di atas, dapat diidentifikasikan permasalahan sebagai berikut:

  1. Tujuan pembelajaran bahasa Inggris pada kelas 10 SMA Negeri 1 Ponorogo belum sepenuhnya tercapai.
  2. Siswa pada kelas 10 SMA Negeri 1 Ponorogo kurang dalam penguasaan bahasa Inggris,, kususnya kemampuan menyimak
  1. Pembatasan Masalah

      Bertumpu pada latar belakang masalah dan fenomena awal, maka permasalahan – permasalahan yang diteliti adalah tentang bagaimana pelaksanaan pembelajaran menyimak dengan pendekatan pengajaran bahasa komunikatif (CLT) pada kelas 10 SMA Negeri 1 Ponorogo.

  1. Rumusan masalah

      Atas dasar permasalahan di atas, secara ringkas masalah pokok yang akan dikaji dalam penelitian ini dapat dirumuskan sebagai berikut:

  1. Bagaimanakah pelaksanaan pembelajaran menyimak dengan pendekatan pengajaran bahasa komunikatif (CLT) pada kelas 10 SMA Negeri 1 Ponorogo ?
  2. Kesulitan-kesulitan apa sajakah yang dihadapi guru dalam pelaksanaan pembelajaran menyimak dengan pendekatan pengajaran bahasa Inggris (CLT) pada kelas 10 SMA Negeri 1 Ponorogo?
  3. Upaya-upaya apakah yang dilakukan guru untuk mengatasi kesulitan dalam menggunakan pendekatan pengajaran bahasa komunikatif (CLT) dalam pembelajaran menyimak pada kelas 10 SMA 1 Ponorogo?
  1. Tujuan Penelitian

     Sejalan dengan permasalahan yang dikemukan, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami dan mendeskripsikan:

  1. Pelaksanaan pembelajaran menyimak dengan pendekatan pengajaran bahasa komunikatif (CLT) pada kelas 10 SMA Negeri 1 Ponorogo.
  2. Kesulitan-kesulitan yang dihadapi guru dalam pelaksanaan pembelajaran menyimak dengan pendekatan pengajaran bahasa komunikatif (CLT) pada kelas 10 SMA Negeri 1 Ponorogo.
  3. Upaya-upaya guru untuk mengatasi kesulitan dalam menggunakan pendekatan pengajaran bahasa komunikatif (CLT) dalam pembelajaran menyimak pada kelas 10 SMA 1 Ponorogo.
  1. Manfaat Penelitian

      Hasil penelitian ini dapat digunakan sebagai bahan masukan bagi para guru bahasa Inggris terhadap pembelajaran yang telah dilaksanakan apakah sudah sesuai dengan pendekatan pengajaran bahasa komunikatif (CLT) dalam pemilihan pendekatan pembelajaran kususnya pembelajaran menyimak untuk mencapai target tujuan pembelajaran pada kelas 10 SMA Negeri 1 Ponorogo.

 

BAB II

KAJIAN TEORI

  1. Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris
  2. Definisi Pembelajaran
  3. Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris
  4. Fokus Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris
  5. Pengajaran Menyimak
  6. Jenis Performansi Menyimak di Kelas
  7. Prinsip Dasar Mendesain Teknik Ketrampilan Menyimak
  8. Keterampilan Menyimak (Listening Skill)
  9. Hakikat Keterampilan Menyimak
  10. Jenis-jenis Keterampilan Menyimak
  11. Menyimak secara Ekstensif (Extensive Listening)
  12. Menyimak secara Intensif (Intensive Listening)
  13. Tujuan dan Manfaat Ketrampilan Menyimak
  14. Proses Ketrampilan Menyimak
  15. Proses Bottom-Up
  16. Proses Top-down
  17. Kompetensi Ketrampilan Menyimak
  18. Penilaian Keterampilan Menyimak
  19. Pengajaran Bahasa Komunikatif (CLT)
  20. Definisi Pengajaran Bahasa Komunikatif (CLT)
  21. Karakteristik Pengajaran Bahasa Komunikatif (CLT)
  22. Prinsip-prinsip Pengajaran Bahasa Komunikatif (CLT)
  23. Masalah-masalah dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Komunikatif (CLT)
  24. Manfaat-manfaat Pengajaran Bahasa Komunikatif (CLT)
  25. Penelitian yang relevan

       Penelitian yang relevan dengan penelitian yang akan dilakukan adalah penelitian dari Saudara Agus Rudi Purwanto (2010) dengan judul “Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris dengan Pendekatan Kontekstual pada Kelas X di SMA Negeri 3 Wonogiri. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan bagaimana pembelajaran bahasa Inggris dengan menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif karena penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan informasi tentang pelasanaan pembelajaran bahasa Inggris dengan pendekatan kontekstual.

  1. Kerangka Berpikir

       Pembelajaran yang efektif tidak terlepas dari penggunaan pendekatan yang dirasa paling sesui dengan tujuan pembelajaran bahasa Inggris. Tujuan pembelajaran bahasa Inggris di kelas akan bisa tercapai apabila pendekatan yang digunakan guru sesuai dengan tujuan pembelajaran. Masih banyak pendekatan yang berpusat pada model ceramah guru. Ini akan membatasi interaksi antara siswa dan guru dikelas sehingga perlu adanya komunikasi yang signifikan antara guru dan siswa dalam proses pembelajaran. Jika ditinjau dari kurikulum yang berlaku, maka pendekatan pengajaran bahasa komunikatif akan lebih dominan pada proses pembelajaran bahasa Inggris khususnya pembelajaran menyimak.

BAB III

METODE PENELITIAN

 

  1. Tempat dan Waktu Penelitian

      Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada kelas 10 SMA Negeri 1 Ponorogo. Penentuan SMA tersebut didasarkan pada pertimbangan bahwa di kabupaten Ponorogo sekolah tersebut dikenal sebagai sekolah yang punya disiplin tinggi dan dikenal masyarakat sebagai sekolah unggulan dalam berbagai kejuaraan.

  1. Pendekatan Penelitian

      Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Penggunaan metode penelitian di atas karena hakikat masalah yang dikaji mengimplikasikan bahwa akan dilakukan penelitian langsung ke lapangan untuk mendapatkan data yang relevan dengan permasalahan penelitian. Peneliti juga ingin mengumpulkan informasi dan mendeskripsikan pembelajaran menyimak dengan pendekatan pengajaran komunikatif (CLT) pada kelas 10 SMA Negeri 1 Ponorogo.

  1. Sumber Data Peneltian

      Sumber data pada penelitian ini berupa informasi yang dikumpulkan untuk dikaji dalam bentuk data kualitatif. Data penelitian dapat digali dari beberapa sumber, yaitu guru bahasa inggris kelas 10, dokumentasi berupa RPP dan silabus pembelajaran menyimak guru kelas 10.

  1. Teknik Pengumpulan Data
  2. Pengamatan (observasi)
  3. Wawancara mendalam (In depth interview)
  4. Catatan lapangan
  5. Kuesioner (untuk mencari sejauh mana motivasi siswa )
  6. Dokumentasi
  1. Keabsahan Data

      Dalam penelitian ini, peneliti menggunakan dua teknik keabsahan data, yaitu pengamatan secara terus menerus dan triangulasi.

  1. Teknik Analisis Data

      Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis interaktif yaitu teknik analisis data kualitatif model Miles and Huberman yang terdiri dari tiga alur kegiatan: reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan/verifikasi.

 

REFERENSI

Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Logman.

Brown, Steven. 2006. Teaching Listening. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Littlewood, William. 1981. Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, David. 1989. Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ricard, Jack C. 2006. Communicative Language Teaching Today. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching. UK: Longman.

Ricard, Jack C. 2008. Teaching Listening and Speaking: From Theory to Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Field, John. 2008. Listening in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Teaching Listening to the Eight Grade Students of Bilingual Program at SMP N 2 Ponorogo in Academic Year 2013/2014

By Adhan Kholis, S.Pd. I

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

  1. Background of the Study

Listening is basic skill for different learning processes. It is an active behaviour in contrast to reading which is just a receiving of sound waves.[1] Listening provided the basis for learning process in English course. Its also different with reading because activities that learners do in reading is just reading and understanding text. While, listening only received of sound.

There are three basic steps listening involves: hearing, understanding, and judging.[2] Firstly, the listeners hear the sound waves. Then, they understand about the content of the texts, and interpret what they have heard.

1

According to Alice, studies indicate that listeners take in raw speech and hold an image of it in short-term memory. Then they try to organize that image into its constituents, identifying both their content and their function of purpose.[3] The listeners try to remember the idea first in order to get sense in listening activities. Then, they identify the content of the texts and try to write down the answer to the notes.

On the other hands, there are two important processes involved the top-down and bottom-up procces. Both of them have difference in processing information when the listeners hear the sound. The top-down means using our prior knowledge and experiences; the listeners know certain things about certain topics and situations and use that information to understand. Bottom-up processing means using the information we have about sounds, word meanings, and discourse markers like first, then and after that to assemble our understanding of what we read or hear one step at a time.[4]

Develop English ability is very important. The one ways to develop it through teaching and learning process. Teaching and learning process that is oriented for achieving certain students’ competence should pay attention to the students need. Teaching and learning process using to help students understand English well and have ability to use English. Listening is one of English language skills that should be learnt first in learning. The students must comprehend it before studying the other skills such as speaking, reading, and writing, because listening is essensial in English language. If the students would know English language well, they should comprehend listening well.

Listening comprehension must be conducted by teaching in the classroom. Teacher must has great idea when they teach listening in the classroom in order to improve their teaching in the class. Teaching also must be meaningful to increase the students’ interest in the classroom. Teacher and students should have good interaction in order to their teaching and learning process become enjoyable. Many steps that teachers do to teach listening in the classroom such as pre-listening, while-listening, and post listening.

Pre-listening means that the teacher makes the students aware of a situation and activates their prior knowledge. While-listening means that the teacher gives the students visual support or guiding questions beforehand. Post-listening is the stage where the students become active and work with what they had heard.[5] In pre-listening, teacher made sure the students toward the text that will be listened from the record. Then, teacher lead the questions and gave some examples related to the topic. In post-listening, the students listen sound and understand what they have heard.

In some case, the lesson provided for a preliminary stage when teachers prepared learners for the listening exercise and for a final stage during which the listening experience was reviewed.[6] Before listening activities was started, teacher gives the material to the students when teacher sets them for listening. Teacher guides and leads the questions based on the material that will be learnt by the students.

During prelistening, teachers traditionally presented the new items of vocabulary that learners were about to encounter in the recording. In postlistening, they checked the answers to comprehension questions and explored the language of the recording.[7] Teacher and students discuss  new vocabulary related to the text in order to the students easy to understand the content of the text. In the last of listening activities, the students check their answer.

In fact, in listening comprehension some listeners found difficulty when they listen the sound. Nunan suggest that there are four clusters of factors which can affect the difficulty of oral language tasks:  these relate to the speaker (how many there are, how quickly they speak, what types of accent they have); the listener (the role of the listener – whether a participant or eavesdropper, the level of response required, the individual interest in the subject); the content (grammar, vocabulary, information structure, background knowledge assumed); support (whether there are pictures, diagrams, or other visual aids to support the text).[8] In this case, listening is influenced by some aspects. Firstly, its caused by the speaker. Sometimes the speaker spoke too fast. Secondly, listening is based on the role of listener. The listeners are from different levels. They have different competence each others when they caught and comprehend the content of the text. Indeed, the students have lack of participation in listening activities. Some students are bored with listening because they didn’t interest with the subject. Thirdly, the substance of the listening’s text is too complex that contents are various kinds such as grammar, vocabulary, etc which caused the students are difficult to comprehend it. Fourth, the text also doesn’t give some clues such as a pictures that can encouraged the students are easy to answer the questions.

In the eight class of bilingual classroom, sometimes teacher gets difficulty in teaching listening. Some listening activities in the class make pupils up, make them move about, create movement or noise and sometimes make them bored and don’t concentrate on the lesson.[9] The students get tired when they do listening activities because of receiving voice or sound for a long time. The students also obtain difficulty when they answered the questions related to the text because of low background knowledge, so that they cheat each others to get right answers. Most of them still confused toward the questions that given by teacher. During the lesson, the students are often doing the other activities that can makes the learning becomes not effective and noisy. When teacher offered them to open the page of material from English lesson book, the students don’t know the page of material, so they still ask to others. They don’t focus and concentrate toward the lesson. Indeed, they don’t know what the content of the text. The students often found the difficult words from the text, so they are confused to understand the meaning. On the other hand, the students have low intrinsic motivation to study English lesson, especially in learning listening. Its also caused by lack of motivation that given by teacher in classroom, so the students became bored and don’t concentrate in listening activities. Therefore, teacher must consider how best he can motivate the students to listen confidently and what are the best strategies or method to help them achieve sound listening skills and concentrate on the lesson.

Teacher must use some approaches and methods in teaching listening skill to help the students to concentrate on the lesson and understand the text. There are also some approaches and methods that helped teacher to teach listening more comfortable.

Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) is one of the approach. Communicative language teaching can be understood as a set of principles about the goals of language teaching, how learners learn a language, the kinds of classroom activities that best facilitate learning, and the roles of teachers and learners in the classroom.[10] In the classroom, teacher and students try to interact each others, makes good interaction in order to their teaching and learning process become meaningful. Teacher also facilitates students when they do listening activities by giving feedback to students when listening activities was done. Teacher used approach in teaching listening by giving the motivation before listening activities, explaining the objectives of study, and so on.

Communicative language teaching is an approach and a philosophical orientation that connects classroom-based language learning with the language that the learners need in order to communicate outside of the classroom.[11] In CLT, teaching is connected with student’s language experience in their daily life when they are talking with others outside of the classroom, so the students are easy to study in the classroom.

Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) refers to both processes and goals in classroom learning.[12] In classroom activities, the students and teacher conduct teaching and learning process to rise the objectives of learning. They interact each others, making decision in order to get value of the learning process.

Communicative approach is based on the premise that what we do in the classroom should have some real-life communicative value. Real-life listening is integrated into such an approach.[13] The output its approach is that the students can communicate with others in real-life. They can use their own language in different situation. For instance, outside class they can use their own language with others. They practice to talk, chat, sharing, and so on.

Communicative approach brings the “implications” of communication to language teaching. These implications have to do with a wider perspective on language and on language learning. The communicative approach looks at what people do with language and how they respond to what they hear.[14] In communicative teaching, the students should be active and give contribution in learning process. In listening activities, the students hear and respond what the speaker intention.

Communicative language teaching aims broadly to apply the theoretical perspective of the communicative approach by making communicative competence the goal of language teaching and by acknowledging the interdependence of language and communication.[15] In this case, communicative competence is the purpose to increase the students’ communication and language teaching in the classroom, easily in listening comprehension. Students try to integrate between listening and speaking in listening activities.

Communicative language teaching created a great deal of enthusiasm and excitement when it first appeared as a new approach to language  teaching in the 1970s and 1980s, and language teachers and teaching institutions all around the world soon began to rethink their teaching, syllabuses, and classroom materials.[16] Communicative approach made and built the students’ interest when this approach was introduced in language teaching. In learning, teacher thinks how to teach well in class by making lesson plan that based on syllabus. Teacher also makes materials that must be appropriated by syllabus.

Another characteristic of the communicative approach is the use of authentic materials. Its considered desirable to give students an opportunity to develop strategies for understanding language as it is actually used by native speakers.[17] In listening, teacher uses some language materials authentic to native speaker from other sources. It made the students have chance to understand English language easily and they can imitate the right speech from the native speaker.

In addition, if students hear only unnatural language in the classroom, their first experince of hearing authentic spoken English in the real world can be demoralizing.[18]. Students are lack of experience if they just received unnatural material. So, teacher chose the appropriate materials that it based on the students needed in class related to authentic materials.

Zekariya emphasizes that “CLT approach features low profile teacher roles, frequent pair work or small group problem solving, students responding to authentic samples of English, extended exchanges on high interest topics, and the integration of the four basic skills, namely speaking, listening,  reading, and writing”.[19] Based on this statement, in CLT approach, teacher has less roles. Teacher is demanded to use English language as much as possible when they give instruction to the students in teaching and learning process. Indeed, the students’ learning is combined by pair work or group to face the assignments. The students are also given the authentic material and they used the four basic skills.

Based on all the explanations above, the writer would like to explain more about Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in teaching listening. CLT makes students became active in their learning process. In addition, students enjoy when doing the listening activities. They are motivated in teaching and learning process. The writer choose CLT in teaching listening because CLT is used by teacher in teaching learning process, especially in teaching listening. The writer describes CLT in teaching listening. Teaching listening must be connected by communicative approach, in order to the students not become bored and passive in their listening activities in the class. The situation of listening activities become enjoyable by giving motivation, feedback, etc. The object of this study is the eight grade students of SMP N 2 Ponorogo. The writer choose SMP N 2 Ponorogo, because the eight class of bilingual teacher used CLT when teaching listening. So that, the writer is interested to give this research with the title “Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Teaching Listening to the Eight Grade Students of Bilingual Program at SMP N 2 Ponorogo in Academic Year 2013/2014”.

 

  1. Research Focus

       This study is focused on the using of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Teaching Listening to the Eight Grade Students of Bilingual Program at SMP N 2 Ponorogo, especially about:

  1. The implementation of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in teaching listening to the eight grade students of bilingual program at SMP N 2 Ponorogo in academic year 2013/2014.
  2. The problems and teacher’s efforts to overcome the problems in the using of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in teaching listening to the eight grade students of bilingual Program at SMP N 2 Ponorogo in academic year 2013/2014.

  1. Statement of the Problems

       Based on the background of the study, the writer investigates the specific problems as follows:

  1. How is the implementation of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in teaching listening to the eight grade students of bilingual program at SMP N 2 Ponorogo in academic year 2013/2014.
  2. What are the problems and teacher’s efforts to overcome the problems in the using of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) to the eight grade students of bilingual Program at SMP N 2 Ponorogo in academic year 2013/2014.

  1. Objectives of the study
  2. To describe the implementation of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in teaching listening to the eight grade students of bilingual program at SMP N 2 Ponorogo in academic year 2013/2014.
  3. To explore the problems and teacher’s efforts to overcome the problems in the using of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) to the eight grade students of bilingual program at SMP N 2 Ponorogo in academic year 2013/2014.

  1. Significances of the study

The result of this study is expected to be beneficial for:

  1. Theoretically

The result of the research can be used as the reference for those who want to conduct a research in teaching listening using Communicative Language Teaching (CLT).

  1. Practically

The result of this research is expected to be beneficial for:

  1. The Students

This research is expected to the students, particularly they comprehend the spoken text in listening activities by using Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) easily.

  1. The Teacher

The writer hopes that the result of this study increases the teacher’s teaching skill, especially in teaching listening by using Communicative Language Teaching (CLT).

  1. The Other Researchers

This research is expected to give knowledge to others in order to explore the other researcher related to Communicative Language Teaching (CLT).

  1. Research Methodology
  2. Research Design

       Research designs are plans and the procedures for research that span the decisions from broad assumptions to detailed methods of data collection and analysis.[20] The writer makes planning and procedures to conduct the research to get data from some sources.

There are three types of research designs such as qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods.[21] In this research, the writer applied qualitative descriptive as a research design. The writer explored the phenomena more by describing it.

Descriptive research often illustrates a relevant but nonquantified topic involving a well-focused research questions.[22] Descriptive research didn’t measure and quantify the topic, but described the phenomena of something that taken from some sources.

The purpose of descriptive research is to generate knowledge that describes something – the opinion of an identified group.[23] In this research, the writer descibed CLT in teaching listening.

The descriptive approach to qualitative research is useful when researchers want to undertake a study which utilises the principles of qualitative research design to explore situations but do not identify a clear theoretical focus found in other approaches to qualitative research.[24] The writer used the descriptive approach because the writer just describes CLT.

Qualitative research is a means for exploring and understanding the meaning individuals or groups ascribe to a social or human problem.[25] In this case, qualitative research is used to understand about the social or human life either individuals or groups.

Qualitative research is an umbrella term for a wide variety of approaches to and methods for the study of natural social life.[26] Qualitative research is seen as a approach or method to know about the nature of social.

Qualitative is a field of inquiry in its own right. It crosscuts diciplines, fields, and subject matter. Qualitative research also defined as multimethod in focus, involving an interpretive, naturalistic approach to its subject matter. This means that qualitative research study thing in their natural setting, attempting to make sense of, or interpret, phenomena in terms of the meanings people bring to them. Qualitative research involves the studied use and a collection of a variety of empirical materials-case study, personal experience, introspective, live story, and interview, observational, historical, interactional and visual texts-that describe routine and problematic moments and meanings in individuals’ lives.[27]

Qualititive is process of research to discover the facts about the something that has happened. Qualitative research is also natural approach to interpret something. It means that qualitative research discussed something that consist of phenomena, making something can be understood, and interpreting in last process of research. Indeed, qualitative research is research that used collecting data from sources such as people’s experiences and  individual’s life. Qualitative used interview, observational, and deep interaction between the researcher and informant to get the data.

From the statement above, qualitative is seen as approach to conduct research by using processes, methods of inquiry that interprete the phenomena of something in the world. It also involves the collection of data from some sources, someone experience, interview, observational, etc.

The goal of qualitative descriptive studies is a comprehensive summarization, in everyday terms, of specific events experienced by individuals or groups of individuals.[28] The writer gets knowledge from the teacher. The writer wants to present the brief of research result and try to give the meaningful research.

Sandelowski in Vickie states that qualitative descriptive research should be seen as a categorical, as opposed to a non-categorical, alternative for inquiry; is less interpretive than an ‘interpretive description’ approach because it does not require the researcher to move as far from or into the data; and, does not require a conceptual or highly abstract rendering of the data, compared to other qualitative designs.[29] In this statement, qualitative descriptive research is seen as the way to determine the object. Its also used for investigation information that taken from data. In research, the writer described the data deeply in order to the data became clearly and more detail.

According to the explanations above, the writer concluded that qualitative descriptive research is a kind of research which is conducted by the researcher to describe something more detail than quantify the data and it emphasized on the direct communication between the researchers and the research object in the process of collecting data.

  1. Researcher Role

In Gold’s classic typology of naturalistic research roles outlined four modes through which observers may gather data: the complete participant, the participant-as-observer, the observer-as-participant, and the complete observer.[30] In this case, in qualitative research, the researcher has four roles. Firstly, the researcher chose and decided the informant. Secondly, the participant as observer. It means that the participant also observed the subject. Thirdly, the researcher observes their subjects when they conduct interviews. The last, the researcher removed from their setting in order to easy to complete their research. The researcher observes without participating.

In this research, the writer is a key instrument, as the full observer and as a data collector, while other instruments support the data.

  1. Research Setting

This study taken place in SMP N 2 Ponorogo. It located at Jl. Jendral Basuki Rachmad No. 44 Ponorogo. Some reasons in selecting the place are:

  1. English is taugh to the students of SMP N 2 Ponorogo.
  2. The place of the research is reachable;
  3. Comunicative Language Teaching (CLT) is frequently applied in teaching listening to the eight grade students of bilingual program at SMP N 2 Ponorogo in academic year 2013/2014.

  1. Data Sources

       Data source is subject where the data can be obtained.[31] It means that data source is subject or somebody that can give the data as material or analysis for research. Data source consists of primary and secondary data.

       The primary data are those which are collected afresh and for the first time, and thus happen to be original in character.[32] Its collected by the investigator himself for the purpose of a specific inquiry or study.[33] Primary data is taken in first time when the researcher doing the research. The writer collected  primary data during the research and obtained the primary data either the recording and transcript of interview related to the implementation of CLT. In this research, the writer took the English Teacher of Bilingual Class as the respondents.

The prominent data source on research subject are group of words and an action, and the rest are an additional content like documents and so forth.[34] In this research, the writer used primary data from the result of interview as a main data. The primary data that the writer used is about teaching listening using communicative language teaching (CLT).

The secondary data are those which have already been collected by someone else and which have already been passed through the statistical process.[35] Secondary data may either be published data or unpublished data. In secondary data may included the books, megazines, newspaper, historical documents, etc that publised by someone. Indeed, the sources of unpublished data are diaries, letters, unpublished biographies and autobiographies, etc. [36]. In this research, the writer used the documents as a secondary data that included teacher’s lesson plan and field notes related to the teacher’s teaching listening. The lesson plan is about teaching listening using CLT. Its just to support the primary data.

  1. Techniques of Data Collection

In collecting the data, the writer used documentation and interview.

  1. Documentation

Documents are prepared for personal rather than official reasons and include diaries, memos, letters, and field notes and so on. Documents closer to speech, require more contextualize interpretation.[37] The writer used documents such as field notes and lesson plan to support the data.

Document means any written material or the film, not a records, which are not prepared because of the demand for an investigator. [38] Document includes the materials that taken from informant when conducting the research.

Suharsimi Arikunto says that: “documentation, coming from document, its a something written. In executing documentation method, the researcher investigates the written object like books, megazine, document, regulations, meeting notes, daily notes and so on.[39]

From the statements above, the writer concluded that documentation is one of the techniques used to obtain the data from the document and written materials. In this research, the writer took documents such as the recording of implementation of CLT in teaching listening, field notes, photo, and lesson plan that related to teaching listening that used by teacher of Eight grade students of SMP N 2 Ponorogo.

This documents are used to get the whole data connected with teaching listening using Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) for the eight grade students of bilingual program at SMP N 2 Ponorogo in academic year 2013/2014.

  1. Interview

An interview is a purposeful conversation usually between two people (but sometimes involving more) that is directed by one in order to get information.[40] In this case, interview is conducted by dialogue or more people to get new something in life. The writer interviews with a teacher in order to get information about teacher’s teaching.

The interview is a conversation, the art of asking questions and listening. It is not a neutral tool, for the interviewer creates the reality of the interview situation. In this situation answers are given.[41] People ask each others about something in order to get information from informant. The interviewer gives some questions and the informant listens and gives the answers. The answers are from the reality of situation or phenomena. It means that the answers are pure from reality.

Interview formats can range from highly structured, consisting of a set of prepared and specific questions to be asked in a particular order of each participant, to unstructured, consisting of nothing more than a general list of topics for possible exploration.[42] In this case, interview is also consist of structured and unstructured interview. In structured interview, there are some specific questions that made structurally by the researcher. Then, these questions are asked to the some informants. While, unstructured interview contents of questions that arranged unstructurally by the researcher.

At the root of in-depth interviewing is an interest in understanding the lived experience of other people and the meaning they make of that experience.[43] Interview is used to understanding about people experience. In this research, the writer used a deep interviewing. The writer interviews deeply with the teacher related to the teacher’s teaching listening using communicative language teaching. By having an depth interviewing with respondents, the writer can obtain information easily about teaching listening using communicative language teaching. The writer hold an interview with,

  • Umini, Pd, as the English teacher of bilingual program. The writer interviews her to get the data about the efforts of teacher to increase the teacher’s teaching skill, especially in teaching listening. The writer wants to know about the implementation of CLT in teaching listening, the problems in the using of CLT approach, and the teacher’s efforts to overcome the problems in the using of CLT.

  1. Techniques of Data Analysis

Data analysis is the process of systematically searching and arranging the interview transcripts, field notes, and other materials that accumulated to increase understanding of them and to enable you to present what you have discovered to others.[44] The writer arranged the transcript of interview in order to make a data, so the data can be understood to others.

On the other hand, data analysis is the last process of the research before writing the report of the research. It is used to answer the question and to prove the hypotesis that will be done. [45] Before writing the report, the writer conducted the data analysis to answer the questions.

Data analysis involves collecting open-ended data, based on asking general questions and developing an analysis from the information supplied by participants.[46] The writer collected the data first based on the questions that given to the participants and analyzed the result of data collection that includes some information from participants.

Qualitative data analysis consists of three current flows as activity: data reduction, data display, and data verification.[47] Firstly, the writer selected the appropriate data and iqnored the unnecessary data. Secondly, the writer organized the data and made conclusion in the end. Each of the stages are presented in the following:

  1. Data Reduction

Data reduction refers to the process of selecting, focusing, simplifying, abstracting, and transforming the data that appear in written-up field notes or transcriptions.[48] In this stage, the writer separated the accurate data from the inaccurate ones. Through the data reduction, the writer focused on the data related to the using of communicative language teaching that will be analyzed.

  1. Data Display

Data display is an organized, compressed assembly of information that permits conclusion drawing and action.[49] The data display made the collected data easier to understand. In this stage, the writer presented the using of communicative language teaching.

  1. Conclusion Drawing/verification

In this stage, the writer made conclusion. The conclusions are also verified as the analyst proceeds. Verification may be as brief as a fleeting second thought crossing the analyst’s mind during writing, with a short excursion back to the field notes.[50] The conclusion is the answer of the writer’s problems related to the using of communicative language teaching.

Data analysis steps shown in the picture as below:

Data Display
Data Collection

Data Reduction
Conclusions:Drawing/Verifying

Figure 1.1

Component of Data Analysis: Interactive Model [51]

  1. Checking the Data Validity

Validity of data is important concept that renewable from validity concept and reliability concept.[52] The level of data validity can be done by using techniques:

  1. The strenuously observation. It means that the writer found the characteristics and elements in the situation that relevan with the chosen issues. The writer can conduct by:
  2. Observing the teacher’s implementation in the using of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in teaching English to the eight grade students of bilingual program at SMPN 2 Ponorogo in academic year 2013/2014.
  3. Studying it specifically until the writer found the appropriated data.
  4. Triangulationisa techniquethat utilizes the data validity checkingsomethingelse outthat dataforchecking purposesoras a comparisonto the data.[53] The writer compared the data that got from interview with the data from documentation. Triangulation is measuring distances between objects by making observations from multiple positions.[54] Its aimed to make the study of the data investigated become more comprehensive. In this research, the writer used triangulations technique with the data source. The writer compared and checks the validity of collected information through the different time and tool in the qualitative method. It can be reached by:
  5. Comparing between the collected data from documentation with the collected data from interview.
  6. Comparing between what people say commonly with what the writer says personally.
  7. Comparing between the collected data from interview with the content of interlaced document.

  1. Research Procedure

In this research, there are four research procedures as below:

  1. Planning

This procedure includes arranging the research plan, choosing the research location, organizing permission, choosing the informants, and preparing the research equipment.

  1. Application

This procedure includes:

  • Understanding the research preparation
  • Entering the field
  • Interacting with the subject while collecting data
  1. Data analysis

It includes analyzing data along after collecting data

  1. Writing the research report.

  1. Organization of the Thesis

Chapter 1  : Introduction.

This chapter introduces the whole of the research that involves: background of the study, research focused, statement of the problems, objectives of the study, significances of the study, research methodology and organization of the thesis.

Chapter 2  : Review of Related Literatures.

This chapter gives the explanation about the theory of teaching, listening, listening comprehension, teaching listening, classification of listening, method to improve communicative listening ability, Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), characteristics of CLT, methodological principles of CLT, the roles in communicative classroom, the problems in the using of CLT, the teacher’s efforts to overcome the problems in the using of CLT, and previous study.

Chapter 3  : Research Findings.

This chapter contains the common data description involving about the implementation of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in teaching listening, the problems and teacher’s efforts to overcome the problems in the using of CLT to the eight grade students of bilingual program SMP N 2 Ponorogo in academic year 2013/2014.

Chapter 4  : Discussion.

This chapter contains of data analysis included the using of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in teaching listening, the problems and teacher’s efforts to overcome the problems in the using of CLT to the eight grade students of bilingual program SMP N 2 Ponorogo in academic year 2013/2014.

Chapter 5  : Conclusion and Recomendation.

This chapter consists of the conclusion of the research and recommendation.

31

CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

  1. Theoretical Background

       The writer has some theories that are relevant studied such as teaching, listening, teaching listening, and CLT. Those all is used as the main ingredient in connecting with the theme of the discussion.

  1. The Nature of Teaching

       Teaching is very important in educational system. It plays important role in which an interaction between a teacher and students in the classroom activities. They are many definitions of teaching defined from many different point of views.

According to Douglas Brown, teaching is guiding and facilities learning, enabling the learner to learn, setting the condition for learning.[55] In teaching, teacher is guiding and facilitating the learners in teaching and learning process in order to the learner can be easy to learn in the classroom. Teacher also sets the situation and condition well, so the students become comfortable in learning.

In another hand, teaching can defined as showing or helping someone to learn how to do something, giving instructions, guiding in the study of something, providing with knowledge, causing to know or understand.[56] Teacher gives knowledge by giving the materials that appropriate with the lesson of study. Teacher also guides and gives instruction to the students when they are difficult in learning process in the classroom.

From some definitions above, the writer concluded that teaching is process to help learners getting knowledge and learning to do something. It cannot be separated from educative activities and must be viewed as a process of systemizing, conditions, task material and opportunities in order to help students acquire and construct new knowledge.

  1. Listening

       Listening is one of four basic competences in English, which have own functions. Listening as a major component in language learning and teaching first hit the spot light in 1970s with James Asher’s work on Total Physical Response.[57] Listening is part of skills in English beside speaking, reading, and writing. Listening is also the main component in English which must be understood by the learners when they study English first. The listeners must has wide background knowledge  to understand the spoken text in listening activities.

       Listening is an active, purposeful process of making sense of what we hear. Listening also receptive skill that it requires a person to receive and understand incoming information (input).[58] In listening, the listener just receive and understand what the speaker intention from the sound that contents some knowledge and information.

The active nature of listening means that, no less than in speaking, the learner must be motivated by a communicative purpose. This purpose determines to a large extent what meanings and he must listen for and which parts of the spoken text are most important to him.[59] Listening also must be taught by communicative teaching, so listening activities not only teacher play the record and the students listen what the speaker intention, but also the students must be motivated by teacher in order to they become enthusiasm and know more about the content of the text.

Listening is the act of assigning meaning to what is heard. Listening is a primary conduit by which individuals acquire information.[60] In this case, listening is process to get meaning from the speech based on what the people have heard in the record.

The most important factors of which listening is composed are the knowledge of linguistic structures, the number of vowel and consonant phonemes (liaison, elision), rhythm (syllable-timed or stress-timed), intonation, prior knowledge, attention and the short- and long- term memory.[61] In listening, many parts that should be known and learnt by the learners such as component of linguistics, such as phonemes, rhythms, intonation, etc. All of those should be understood by learner when the students are conducting listening activities.

From the explanations above, the writer concluded that listening is activities that conducted by students consists of receiving, responding, and interpretating information from the sound waves in the record and it connected by the students’ knowledge.

  1. The Nature of Listening Comprehension

       The nature of listening comprehension means that the learner should be encouraged to engage in an active process of listening from meanings, using not only the linguistic cues but also his nonlinguistic knowledge.[62]. The learner uses not only their comprehension about knowledge of linguistic structures, but also they must has background of knowledge to understand the content of the text.

       Listening is not a one-way street and it’s not merely the process of an undirectional receiving of audible symbols. One faced-the first step-of listening comprehension in the psychomotor process of receiving sounds waves through the ear  and transmitting nerve impulses to the brain.[63] Listening not only hears about sound in the radio or tape recorder but also the listeners hear and respond what the speaker intention widely.

Listening as comprehension is the traditional way of thinking about the nature of listening. Indeed, in most methodology manuals listening and listening comprehension are synonymous. This view of listening is based on the assumption that the main function of listening in second language learning is to facilitate understanding of spoken discourse.[64] Listening comprehension is regarded as nature process of listening to get information. In the classroom, teacher conducts listening activities in order to facilitate the students in understanding of spoken texts.

From all the definitions stated above, the writer can conclude that listening comprehension is regarded theoretically as an active process in which individuals concentrate on selected aspects of aural input, form meaning, from passages, and associate what they hear with existing knowledge, it also a structural process of transferring data from the speaker through media and acceptable in sense of hearing.

  1. The Essential of Teaching Listening

       There are three different stages of teaching listening: pre-listening, while-listening and post-listening. Pre-listening means that the teacher makes the students aware of a situation and activates their prior knowledge. While-listening means that the teacher gives the students visual support or guiding questions beforehand. Post-listening is the stage where the students become active and work with what they had heard.[65] In pre-listening, teacher made sure the students toward the text that will be listened from the record. Then, teacher lead the questions and gave some examples related to the topic. In post-listening, the students listen sound and understand what they have heard.

In some case, the lesson provided for a preliminary stage when teachers prepared learners for the listening exercise and for a final stage during which the listening experience was reviewed.[66] In this case, teacher also gave the material to the students when teacher prepared and made sure the students and for final stage.

In teaching listening, teacher must choose appropriate courses. Most of these courses are structured in the same way. They typically contain chunks of spoken language which take between three and seven minutes to play. [67] Teacher must choose the appropriate materials based on the students’ level. The material should contain some pieces of spoken language.

  1. The Classification of Listening

       There are several kinds of listening process and explain as below:

  1. The Bottom-Up Process

Bottom-up processing means using the information we have about sounds, word meanings, and discourse markers like first, then and after that to assemble our understanding of what we read or hear one step at a time.[68] The learners use the some comprehension such as sounds, vocabulary, and conjunction to understand the text easily when they read and listen in the first time.

With bottom-up processing, students start with the component parts: words, grammar, and the like.[69] In listening, students use their knowledge about vocabulary and grammar to understand the content of the text and to make sense of the sounds that speech presents to us.

  1. The Top-Down Process

       The use of inside the head knowledge, that is, knowledge which is not derectly encoded in words, is known as the top-down view of listening.[70] People use their knowledge related to the text when they read or listen in the first time.

Top-down models emphazise the use of previous knowledge in processing a text rather than relying upon the individual sounds  and words.[71] When the listeners hear the sound, they use general knowledge to process a text in order to interprete it easily.

Top-down means using our prior knowledge and experiences; we know certain things about certain topics and situations and use that information to understand.[72] Students use their background of knowledge and experiences to know things from the text when the students understand the text.

  1. The Method to Improve Communicative Listening Ability

       Tsinghong Ma suggests a basic methodological model for the teaching of receptive skills. The model has five basic stages which are:[73]

  1. Lead-in

Here the students and the teacher prepare themselves for the task and familiarize themselves with the topic of the listening tasks and exercises. One of the major reasons for this is to create expectations and arouse the students’ interest in the subject matter of the spoken or written text.

  1. Teacher directs comprehension task

Here the teacher makes sure that the students know what they are going to do. Are they going to answer question, fill in a chart, complete a message pad or try and re-tell what they heard/saw? This is where the teacher explains and directs the students’ purpose for listening.

  1. Students listen for task

The students then read or listen to a text to perform the task the teacher has set.

  1. Teacher directs feedback

When the students have performed the task the teacher will help students to see if they have completed the task successfully and will find out how well they have done. This may follow a stage in which students check their answers with each other first.

  1. Teacher directs text-related task

Teacher will then probably organize some kind of follow-up task related to the text. Thus if the students have filled a form based on a heard discussion, the text-related task might be to discuss in groups the same or related topic.

From the explanation above, the writer can conclude that there are steps to improve communicative listening ability such as firstly, teacher gives a leading question before starting listening activities. Then, teacher directs comprehension task. After that, students listen the record from tape recording or radio directly. Then, teacher gives feedback by asking them when they get difficulty in listening. Finally, the students answer the questions and discuss together in the end of listening activities.

With the development of communicative approaches to language teaching, and particularly with the increasing popularity of authentic materials, classroom activities have become more closely related to the sorts of thing learners are likely to want or need to do outside the classrooms. With low-level learners, the activity rather than the listening text is modified to make the task easier. Instead of being expected to exstract the full meaning of the text, the listener might only be required to determine the number of speakers or to identify the number of key words.[74] The following shows how the activity rather than the text can be adapted.

The first time they hear the text, they might be asked to identify how many speakers they hear. The second time, they hear the text, they can be given a list of key words and asked to nominate how often they hear the words. Next, they can be given phrase to identify. Lastly, they can be asked to identify the number of questions they hear.[75] These activities are exemplified below.

  1. Listen to the tape. How many speakers can you hear?
  2. Listen to the tape a second time. How many times can you hear these words? (Tick the column)

Clinic – Doctor – Appointment – Surgery – Name

  1. Listen again and circle the words you hear
  2. Hold the phone, please
  3. Hold the line, please
  4. Listen to the tape one more time. How many questions can you hear?[76]

  1. Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)
  2. Definition of CLT

       Communicative language teaching (CLT) made its initial appearance in the early 1970s as a reaction against the theoretical assumptions underlying situational language teaching. It was decided that there was a need for language teaching to focus not just on the mastery of grammatical structures but also on communicative proficiency.[77] Communicative approach comes in language teaching because its to advance teaching methodology when the situational language teaching is felt less of contribution in teaching learning process. In CLT, teaching not only focused on grammatical structures, but also communicative proficiency.

Communicative Language Teaching is viewed as an approach or philosophy to teaching, not a set method; it sees fluency and the ability to communicate in a variety of settings and in a variety of ways (verbal and nonverbal, written) at the core of teaching and learning.[78] In this case, communicative approach is seen as approach not a method. It needs fluency and skill to communicate with others in teaching learning process.

Communicative language teaching can be understood as a set of principles about the goals of language teaching, how learners learn a language, the kinds of classroom activities that best facilitate learning, and the roles of teachers and learners in the classroom.[79] In the classroom, teacher and students try to interact each others, makes good interaction in order to their teaching and learning process become meaningful. Teacher also tried to facilitate students when they do listening activities by giving feedback to students when listening activities was done.

Activities that are truly communicative, according to Diane, have three features: information gap, choice, and feedback.[80] In communicative listening activities, the activities that conducted by the students are information gap and choice. Some questions may include a multiple choice or fill in blank. Teacher gives feedback to the students in listening activity.

Communicative approach or Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) is the name which was given to a sets of beliefs which included not only a re-examination of what aspects of language to teach, but also a shift in emphasis in how to teach.[81] Communicative approach not only discussed about how to teach in the classroom, but also explained about the teacher’s difficulties when they are teaching in the classroom.

Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) is generally regarded as an approach to language teaching. As such, CLT reflects a certain model or research paradigm, or a theory. It is based on the theory that the primary function of language use is communication.[82] Communicative language teahing is regarded as a approach in teaching of language. Its based on the function of language that it is for communication.

Jack Richard states, “One of the most characteristic features of communicative language teaching is that it pays systematic attention to functional as well as structural aspects of language”.[83] The characteristic of CLT gave the functional aspects to language teaching.

One of the basic assumptions of communicative approach is that students will be more motivated to study a foreign language since they will feel they are learning to do something useful with the language they study.[84] With the communicative approach, the students are motivated with the teaching learning process, so that, they enjoy to study a foreign language.

Also, teachers give students an opportunity to express their individuality by having them share their ideas and opinions on a regular basis. This helps students to integrate the foreign language with their own personality and thus to feel more emotionally secure with it.[85] In learning, students have chance to express and share their opinion when they answer the questions orally.

Another characteristic of communicative approach is the use of authentic materials. Its considered desirable to give students an opportunity to develop strategies for understanding language as it is actually used by native speakers.[86] In listening, teacher used some language materials authentic to native speaker from other sources

Common to all versions of Communicative language teaching is a theory of language teaching that starts from a communicative model of language and language use, and that seeks to translate this into a design for an instructional system, for materials, for teacher and learner roles and behaviors, and for classroom activities and techniques.[87] In this case, communicative approach is seen as model or design that included the system, choosing materials, the roles of teacher and learner in classroom, and some activities in the classroom.

  1. Characteristics of CLT

CLT has some characteristics as Dougles Brown states below:

  • Classroom goals are focused on all of the components (grammatical, discourse, functional, sociolinguistic, and strategic) of communicative competence.
  • Language techniques are designed to engage learners in the pragmatic, authentic, functional use of language for meaningful purposes. Organizational language forms are not the central focus, but rather aspects of language that enable the learner to accomplish those purposes.
  • Fluency and accuracy are seen as complementary principles underlying communicative techniques. At times fluency may have to take on more importance than accuracy in order to keep learners meaningfully engaged in language use.
  • Students in a communicative class ultimately have to use the language, productively and receptively, in unrehearsed contexts outside the classroom. Classroom tasks must therefore equipt students with the skills necessary for communication in those contexts.
  • Students are given opportunities to focus on their own learning process through an understanding of their own styles of learning and through the development of appropriate strategies for autonomous learning.
  • The role of the teacher is that of facilitator and guide, non an all-knowing bestower of knowledge. Students are therefore encouraged to construct meaning through genuine linguistic interaction with others.[88]

From the explanations above, the writer can conclude that the characteristics of CLT focuses on all aspects of language. Communicative approach is also designed to persuade the students to use their language to be meaningful. The students also focus on learning process by using their own studying style. The fluency and accuracy in this case are also important. In communicative teaching, the teacher acts as a guidance and facilitator when the students learn language in the classroom.

  1. Methodological Principles of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) Approach

       CLT also has some principles that can used by a teacher in teaching and learning in the classroom. Klaus Brandl defined methodological principles as a list of design features that can be generally regarded as being facilitative to second language acquistion. The following list, adapted from Doughty and Long, serves as a guideline for implementing communicative language teaching (CLT) practices.[89]

  • Use Tasks as an Organizational Principle

        For decades traditional methods of language teaching have used grammar topics or texts (e.g., dialogues, short stories) as a basis for organizing a syllabus. With CLT methodologies this approach has changed; the development of communicative skills is placed at the forefront, while grammar is now introduced only as much as needed to support the development of these skills.

  • Promote Learning By Doing

        A task-based approach to learning implies the notion of learning by doing. This concept is not new to communicative language teaching methodologies, but it has been recognized and promoted as a fundamental principle underlying learning through out history by many educators. It is based on the theory that a hands-on approach positively enhances a learner’s cognitive engagement.

  • Input Needs to be Rich

       Considering the rich input we each experience and are exposed to while developing our native tongue, growing up speaking in our native languages means that we are exposed to a plethora of language patterns, chunks, and phrases in numerous contexts and situations over many years. Such a rich exposure to language ultimately allows us to store language in our brains that we can retrieve and access as whole chunks. Needless to say, there is no way we can replicate this rich input in the classroom alone in order to develop native-like language skills. Nevertheless, the input provided needs to be as rich as possible. As Klaus Brandl put it, rich input entails “realistic samples of discourse use surrounding native speaker and non-native speaker accomplishments of targeted tasks”. This makes one of the most obvious necessities in teaching a foreign language that the student get to hear the language, whether from the teacher, from multimedia resources (TV, DVDs, video and audio tapes, radio, online), from other students, or any other source, and furthermore be exposed to as rich a diet of authentic language discourse as possible.[90]

  • Input Needs to be Meaningful, Comprehensible, and Elaborated

       A fundamental prerequisite for learning to occur is that the information we process must be meaningful. This means the information being presented must be clearly relatable to existing knowledge that the learner already possesses. This existing knowledge must be organized in such away that the new information is easily assimilated, or “attached,” to the learner’s cognitive structure. The necessity of meaningfulnessis not in particular new to CLT.

  • Promote Cooperative and Collaborative Learning

       In general education, cooperative or collaborative learning has long been recognized as a strong facilitator of learning. In such an approach, classrooms are organized so that students work together in small cooperative teams, such as groups or pairs, to complete activities. In second language learning environments, students work cooperatively on a language-learning task or collaboratively by achieving the goal through communicative use of the target language. Particularly in the latter case, if the learning tasks are designed to require active and true communicative interaction among students in the target language, they have numerous benefits on attainment.

  • Focus on Form

        In contrast, a focus on form approach to explicit grammar teaching emphasizes a form-meaning connection and teaches grammar within contexts and through communicative tasks. Doughty and Long point out that overwhelming empirical evidence exists in favor of a focus-on form approach, hence they pro claim it a fundamental methodological principle in support of CLT and task-based language instruction.

  • Provide Error Corrective Feedback

       In a general sense, feedback can be categorized in two different ways: positive feedback that confirms the correctness of a student’s response. Teachers demonstrate this behavior by agreeing, praising, or showing understanding. Or, negative feedback, generally known as error correction, which has a corrective function on a student’s faulty language behavior. As learners produce language, such evaluative feedback can be useful in facilitating the progression of their skills toward more precise and coherent language use.

  • Recognize and Respect Affective Factors of Learning

       Over the years, consistent relationships have been demonstrated between language attitudes, motivation, performance anxiety, and achievement in second language learning. Needless to say, all teachers eventually experience how learners feel about the target language or how their attitudes toward it impact their motivation and subsequently their success. As Klaus Brandl put it, a learner who is motivated “wants to achieve a particular goal, devotes considerable effort to achieve this goal, and experiences in the activities associated with achieving this goal”.[91]

From the explanations above, the writer can conclude that the principles of CLT are use tasks as an organizational principle, promote learning by doing, input needs to be rich, input needs to be meaningful, comprehensible, and elaborated, promote cooperative and collaborative learning, focus on form, provide error corrective feedback, and recognize and respect affective factors of learning.

In other hand, Richards has different principles of CLT. He summarized the overarching principles of CLT as following:[92]

  1. Make real communication the focus of language learning.
  2. Provide opportunities for learners to experiment and try out what they know.
  3. Be tolerant of learners’ errors as they indicate that the learners are building up their communicative competence.
  4. Provide opportunities for learners to develop both accuracy and fluency.
  5. Link the different skills such as speaking, reading, and listening together, since they usually occur so in the real world.
  6. Let students induce or discover grammar rules.

In this case, the principles of CLT approach are that CLT makes students be active in classroom. In addition, teaching and learning must be meaningful, teacher gives the chances to the students to correct the errors in their leaning. The students also use four English skills in their learning in order to the teaching and learning process can be meaningful.

In other hand, there are also founded some key principles of CLT. Its based on Richards and Rodgers summarized:

  1. The goal of instruction is learning to communicate effectively and appropriately
  2. Instruction is contextualized and meaning-based.
  3. Authentic materials are incorporated from the start.
  4. Repetition and drilling are used minimally.
  5. Learner interaction is maximized; the teacher acts as a facilitator of learning.
  6. Fluency is emphasized over accuracy.
  7. Errors are viewed as evidence of learning.[93]

From the statements above, the writer can conclude that in CLT approach many of principles such as the teacher’s instruction in learning is important to persuade the students become active in their learning. Then, the materials are used in learning is authentic material. Teacher also drills to the students minimally. Indeed, in teaching, teacher become a facilitator. The teacher gave feedback if the students found the difficulty in their learning.

  1. The Roles in the Communicative Classroom

       The type of classroom activities proposed in CLT also implied new roles in the classroom for teachers and learners. Learners now had to participate in classroom activities that were based on a cooperative rather than individualistic approach to learning.[94] The students should be active not passive in the classroom. They can discuss each others in their group when they do the lesson.

The teacher facilitates communication in the classroom. In this role, one of his major responsibilities is to establish situations likely to promote communication. During the activities, he acts as an advisor, answering students’ questions and monitoring their performance.[95] In teaching and learning process, teacher facilitated  the learners to use their own language. Teacher persuaded the learners become active in listening activities. Teacher also guided and helps them if the students find difficulty when they answer the questions.

Teachers now had to assume the role of facilitator and monitor rather than being a model for correct speech and writing and one with the primary responsibility of making students produce plenty of error-free sentences, the teacher had to develop a different view of learners’ errors and of her/his own role in facilitating language learning.[96] Teacher not only as a model for students in learning, but also teacher know and give attention more toward the students’ errors when they used the own language.

Moreover, teacher needs to motivate their students, as well as provide them with a comfortable classroom atmosphere for language learning.[97] Teacher gives motivation to the students before and after teaching and learning process. In listening activities, teacher makes situation and condition become comfortable in order to the students enjoy in listening and concentrate on lesson.

Zakariya states that the roles of teacher in CLT consist of, but are not limited to, coordinator and manager of activities, language instructor, source of new language, consultant when needed, as well as participant.[98] Teacher as a guidance in teaching learning process. Teacher also an instructor, source of knowledge, and the director for the learner in the classroom.

According to David Nunan, teacher has three main roles in the communicative classroom. The first is to act as facilitator of the communicative process, the second is to act as a participant, and the third is to act as an observer and learner.[99] In this case, teacher has some roles in teaching and learning such as teacher facilitated the students when they negotiated each others in learning, teacher as a model for learners, and also as a observer when the learner study in the classroom.

  1. The Problems in the Using of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)

Teachers has some problems or difficulties when they are using communicative approach in teaching process.

       Some characteristics of CLT make it difficult for a nonnative speaking teacher who is not very proficient in the second language to teach effectively. Dialogues, drills, rehearsed exercises, and discussion (in the first language) of grammatical rules are much simpler for some nonnative speaking teachers to contend with.[100] This drawback should not deter one, however, from persuing communicative goals in the classroom. Technology (such as video, television, audiotapes, the Internet, the web, and computer software) can aid such teachers.[101]

Tricia Hedge, for example comment on the heavy linguistic demands made by communicative language teaching on non-native teachers whose energy is ‘inevitably used up in the constant struggle with their own language deficiencies, leaving only a small fraction for attending to their students’ problems’.[102] His argument is essentally for restraint in introducing communicative language teaching to non-native teachers, selecting the more moderate ideas for materials and methodology and being cautious with the more farfetched.[103]

Zakariya emphasizes that “CLT approach  features low profile teacher roles, frequent pair work or small group problem solving, students responding to authentic samples of English, extended exchanges on high interest topics, and the integration of the four basic skills, namely speaking, listening, reading, and writing”.[104]

Zakariya also further states that CLT discourages pervasive teacher- controlled drills, quizzing of memorized material, and extensive explanation on forms of English.[105] In this case, teacher should drill the students in learning process, giving the material that contents of memoration, and explaining English language clearly.

Mansour Khoosa and Mashoume Yakhabi argued that one of the most difficult problems in making classroom learning communicative is the absence of native speakers. Apparently, CLT are more successful in English as a Second Language (ESL) context because students have the motivation to work on oral English because they need it in their lives.[106]

In contrast, in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context, due to some physical limitations, such as the purpose of learning English, learning environments, teachers’ English proficiency, and the availability of authentic English materials, CLT meets much more difficulties during its application.[107]

On the other hand, in a setting where English is a foreign language, students usually learn with low intrinsic motivation; English may be deemed irrelevant with students’ needs because the language is not part of their everyday life.[108]

  1. The Teacher’s Efforts to Overcome the Problems in the Using of CLT Approach

       There is evidence to suggest that teachers who have more freedom in decision-making and who see value in a communicative approach, either because its goals coincide with their learner’s needs or because they see value in the kinds of activities it offers, can adjust the approach to suit their own circumstances.

Sano, Takahashi, and Yoneyama in Tricia Hedge, to quote one instance, have argued that in Japanese secondary-school classrooms the need to use English is not strongly felt because it does not have an extensive role in Japanese society. For this reason, teachers have redirected their communicative goals toward self-expression and personal growth in students rather than towards authentic communicative needs in the world outside the classroom.[109]

Indeed, by regarding the classroom as a small community and emphasizing the subjective side of human communication, we can provide classroom experiences which involve both learning English and general human development.[110]

Tricia Hedge gives a further example of how the cultural tradition in vietnam of students forming ‘family groups’ with peers in their classes at university has had its own effect on the use of groupwork. Teacher and students using communicative materials such as the Headway course will adapt the methodology advocated in creative ways to suit their need to work collaboratively but as a whole class.[111]

These examples show how teachers and learners have found an optimal match between communicative goals and procedures, and their own context. They provide interesting argument and support for locally generated methodology.

As established earlier, many students will have to use English in their future careers. To make this fact more immediate and real to the students, perhaps the teaching materials should be changed to reflect these specific needs. Data could be gathered from real people who use English in their careers, and integrated into lesson plans in addition to travel, correspondence and other potential uses already recognized.[112]

On the other hand, English EFL teachers presently employed should be given the opportunity to improve their skills. In order for these teachers to make progress, they must be given what they need to make it work. Schools will have to make serious commitments toward giving teachers the time and opportunity to attend training regularly, and, if possible, sabbaticals to study abroad.[113]

  1. Previous Study

This study needs some previous research as a consideration theory. The detail explain as below:

The first previous research finding that can be used as a consideration theory is taken from Lutfiana Kusuma Wardani (210907032) titled “Teaching Listening Using TOEIC Oriented Program For The Twelfth Grade Accountancy’s Students Of SMKN 1 Ponorogo In Academic Year 2010/2011”. The researcher above used qualitative research as research methodology and the result of this study are “Teaching Listening using TOEIC can improve their English mastery particularly in listening comprehension, teaching listening using TOEIC oriented program is promotes three stages of teaching and learning process including pre-activity, while-activity, and post- activity, and the advantages of TOEIC oriented program to the students included comprehend spoken English and helping the students to improve their knowledge concerning with the vocabularies and grammatical section.[114]

The second previous that can be used as a consideration theory is taken from Widya Dwi Astuti S.A titled “Teaching Listening Comprehension Using Song Dictation Qualitative Research In MA Al- Mawaddah Ponorogo. The researcher above used qualitative research as research methodology and the result of this study are “In listening process, there are three activities: Before listening plan for listening task such as lesson plan and material, during listening teachers ask the students to listen to the cassette and fill the gaps with the suitable word. Then the students study and understand the texts of song. The advantages of song dictation in teaching listening comprehension at MA AL- Mawaddah Coper Jetis Ponorogo for teacher are the students feel more enjoy, interest, they have good interaction and the melody and rhythm of songs help to maintain the natural rhythm and stress of speed which can be easily lost by dictation sentences at a slow pace.[115]

From all the previous research findings explained above, the researcher convincing that the study of “Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Teaching Listening” never researched by any other researchers so far. The writer will state the using of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Teaching Listening, the problems and teacher’s efforts to overcome the problems in the using of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT).

64

CHAPTER III

RESEARCH FINDING

This chapter presents data description and research findings about the implementation of the using of CLT, the problems and teacher’s efforts in the using of CLT in teaching listening.

  1. The Implementation of CLT in Teaching Listening to the Eight Grade Students of Bilingual Program at SMP N 2 Ponorogo in Academic Year 2013/2014

Listening is very essensial in English learning. Its also one of English skills that must be learnt by students in the classroom. Listening must be conducted by teaching in the class. Teaching listening should be conducted with comfortable and enjoyable in what situation and condition in order to the students not become bored and tired in listening activities. In teaching, teacher used some approaches and methods to improve and help their teaching and learning process in order to teacher and students enjoy with learning in the classroom.

Teacher used communicative language teaching when they taught listening in the classroom such as teacher of SMP N 2 Ponorogo in class eight grade of Bilingual program. Teacher integrated four skills in teaching listening. So, the listening activities not only teacher played the recorder and the students do exercises after listening, but also teacher introduces background knowledge, discussing and negotiation each others. Firstly, teacher gives greeting to the students. Then, teacher and the students pray together before starting teaching and learning process. Teacher also asked to the students about the students’ experience. Teacher gives the model or examples related to the topic to them before listening activities. Teacher tried to explore the students’ mind by giving brainstorming to know how far the students understand about the topic of the listening text before conducting listening section. Then, teacher gives motivation by explaining the importance of material that will be studied at that time. Indeed, teacher doesn’t give the material directly to the students when listening activities will be done, but teacher interacts with students, such as Mrs. Umini, S. pd stated:

“Basically, in teaching and learning listening, we don’t give the materials directly to the students. Teacher must give an exploration to know how far the students’ comprehend toward the material or topic that will be given. So that, the students are guided in order to the students’ mind can focus with the material that will be learnt”. Indeed, teacher is also demanded to use English language much and correctly when giving the instruction and explanation the material to the students in listening activity.[116]

       In listening activities, teacher gives a leading question firstly based on material which will be taught in the class. Teacher gave the simple question. Teacher also asked about the students’ activities during holiday. For example, what did you do yesterday? Teacher and students discuss and negotiate about the topic that will be listened in the record, so that the students not become panic when they faced the various texts. Then, teacher shared the listening material and offered to the students to find the difficult words from the text. Teacher gives about ten vocabulary in their listening text before the students listen sound from the record. After that, teacher makes sure that the students know what they are going to do. Then, the students listen the sound from the record about twice or three times. On the other hand, teacher also gives feedback and checks their answer before discussing together. The students have chance to speak English when they wished to express their idea or opinion to teacher in the classroom.

Based on the documentations, teacher used some teaching stages or steps when conducting  listening activities as following as:[117]

Step 1:Lead-in

Here the students and teacher prepare themselves for the task and familiarize themselves with the topic of the listening tasks and exercise. Then, teacher gives motivation to the students by discussing about the student’s life experience that it related to the topic of the text that will be learn in the class.

Step 2:Teacher directs comprehension task

Teacher makes sure that the students know what they are going to do. Teacher explained the objectives of learning and topic of the text that will be studied together in that day.

Step 3: Students listen for task

Teacher turns on the cassette twice or three times. Then, the students read or listen to a text to perform the task that teacher has set.

Step 4:Teacher gives the feedback

        Teacher will helped the students to see if they have completed the task successfully and will find out how well they have done. For instance, teacher gives the simple questions to the students such as, “How many speakers can you hear?”.

Step 5:Students listen the sound again

Teacher turns on the cassette one again. Then ask them “How many times can you hear these words?”

Step  6:Teacher directs text-related task

Teacher will then probably organize some kinds of follow-up task related to the text. Then students and teacher discuss together about the result of listening activities that has done in the class. In the end, teacher concludes the learning material and gives the information related to the lesson that will be done in next day.

Based on interview with Mrs. Umini said that there are some procedures to teach listening as following as:

  1. Exploration
  2. Turning on the audio (Its not just one time, if the students not understand yet or this time I will turn on, firstly, I will turn on the audio till end. Secondly, I will turn on part to part. Then, that is not only turn on the audio one time but also turn on it repeatedly. Its can be three times in order to the students not become panic)
  3. Answering the questions
  4. Turning on the audio again
  5. Checking the students’ answers related to the what they have heard.[118]

In communicative teaching, the material that usually used by teacher in listening activities is authentic text. It is from native speaker such as America’s and English people. Teacher used many materials in teaching listening. Teacher also choosed the appropriate materials to the students. The material is based on the students’ level or the students’ needed,  such as Umini S,pd state:

In listening, all texts can be used such as recount, narrative, report, and advertisement. All materials can be used in listening and those are steps that must be passed in learning English language.”[119]

The material is also appropriated with the syllabus and lesson plan that teacher made. Teacher taught based on syllabus and lesson plan. Beside that, teacher took the material from many sources. Teacher can use some books, but the material must be appropriated with syllabus, such as Umini said:

We teach not stand on books, but we teach based on syillabus and lesson plan, while the source are from other sourches that not swerve with the syillabus and lesson plan.[120]

In addition, in teaching listening using communicative approach, the student’s answers toward the questions interrogated with oral activities, such as students rise their hand and answer the questions orally not by written in the white board. Its done one by one to find the correct answer. Teacher gives the students the opportunity to answer the questions. When the students answer the questions orally, teacher observe and correct the word. Teacher asks to the students to spell and give meaning to the word. So, listening activities are also correlated with student’s pronounciation and fluency when the students answering the questions, such as Umini stated:

“In learning listening the students’ answer related to questions are orally, but in reading may be the answer is written”.[121]

In teaching listening, the role of teacher as facilitator in their learning process. Teacher facilitated the students by giving feedback when they didn’t understand with the content of the texts. Teacher also walks around the class to check them if they have difficulties in answering the questions during listening activities and helps them to guide in their listening activities. Teacher also makes them be sure with the texts that will be listened before conducting listening activities in order to they not become panic when they listened in the classroom.

Mrs. Umini says:

In teaching listening, teacher as a facilitator, so the teacher just give facilitation to them when the learning was done.”[122]

In the end of learning, teacher gives the conclusion based on the material that has learnt at that time and announces to them the material that will be discussed in next time. Teacher also remembered the students about the topic that will be learnt in next meeting and giving motivation to them in order to they can ready and study in home.

  1. The Problems and Teacher’s Efforts to Overcome the Problems in the Using of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Teaching Listening to the Eight Grade Students of Bilingual Program at SMP N 2 Ponorogo in Academic Year 2013/2014

 

       Teaching listening using communicative approah practically is used by teacher of Bilingual Class in SMP 2 Ponorogo. Teacher  used this approach to develop their teaching in the classroom. Many reasons why teacher used CLT approach as a approach to teach listening. For instance, teacher wanted the students are more motivated in their listening activities. The students are hoped can understand the content of the text easily. But, beside that, when teacher used communicative approach in teaching listening, teacher found some difficulties and problems. The problems are from some aspects such as the students have low background knowledge when they must be faced on spoken text. Most students didn’t understand the content of the text. They felt difficult when they comprehend the text. They also found the new vocabulary from the text. Those all makes the students are confused when they listen the sound waves.

Such as Mrs. Umini state: “Sometimes, when the learning was done, there are some students who didn’t understand toward the topic that will be listened in sound system, so that they still asked with other friends.[123]

During teaching listening, teacher and the students discuss and negotiate each other. Teacher gives the model to them before listening activities. Teacher also explain the topic of the material before the students listen the sound from the record. In addition, teacher asked to the students to find out the difficult words and discussed it together in order to the students are easy to understand the text. In this case, teacher gave about ten difficult words from the text and asked to students to find out it in their dictionary. Teacher gives a lot of time to them to read text in order to they understand more about topic before listening activities. They should read text till they understand what they have read. Teacher doesn’t start listening section if the students don’t ready toward text. Teacher gives chance to them to understand text before listening section.

Such as Mrs.Umini state: “Before listening activities were done, I also asked to the students to find the difficult words in the text, so that the students understand about the contents of that text.”[124]

       The second problems are teacher also must used English language in the classroom fluently and accuratelly. Teacher is demanded to use english language as well as possible and as much as possible when giving instruction to them. When teacher gave the feedback to the students, teacher should speak English well. Teacher just uses Indonesian language when students don’t understand more, so teacher explained by using Indonesian language. But, all activities in listening activities, teacher is demanded to use English language when gave instruction to the students.

Such as Mrs. Umini state: “In using communicative approach, teacher is demanded to use English language well and right when giving instruction and explaining the material or giving feedback to the students.[125]

      Such as Mila said : “In my opinion, listening is comfortable, but sometimes teacher explained the material not clearly, so that it can make me little confused.”[126]

From this problems, teacher studied about pronounciation and lesson plan herself before teaching in the classroom in order to the teaching is done clearly and effectively. Teacher must become the good model for the students in correct speech. Teacher thought the way to teach listening become enjoyable by studying before entrance to the classroom. Teacher also brought the notes about the material and write the English pronounciation to the difficult words.

Such as Mrs. Umini state: “Before I am teaching in the classroom, I studied about the lesson plan and speaking such as pronounciation when giving the instruction to the students in the class in order to learning is done clearly.”[127]

       The third problems are the student’s answers toward the questions are orally. The students should integrate the four skills in English language, namely speaking, reading, and writing. The students don’t write down the answers in white board. They only read their answers based on what they have heard. Teacher ask to the students to rise their hand one by one to find the correct answer. In this case, they must use their own english language fluency and accurately when answering the questions in listening activities.

Such as Mrs. Umini state: “The students sometimes found the difficulty when they answered the questions. They are still wrong in pronouncing the word or sentence.”[128]

       On the other hands, one of students give opinion such as Suryaningtyas said : “I feel difficulty in translating and understanding the question. Sometimes, the questions are too difficult to understand because of long question and when answering the questions I felt difficulty to pronounce it because teacher asked the students to answer orally and fluently.[129]

Teacher combinate between listening and speaking skill in listening activities in order to the students not only hear the speaker intention, but also they can use their own english language fluently and accurately.

From this problems, teacher corrects their answer orally by giving feedback when the students answered the questions. Teacher gives some clues to persuade them try to answer the questions correctly by explaining the word. Teacher gave chance to other students to help each others.

The last problems are from the student’s participation in the listening activities. Some of them didn’t focus and concentrate with the listening course.

Such as Suryaningtyas said: “In my opinion, listening in the class is useful. But, the teacher’s explanation is less and the class’s condition may be noticed before conducting listening. Most of friends not ready yet with listening so that they asked each others.”[130]

The students are low participation when they listen the record because they feel tired and didn’t understand the speaker’s intention. These problems make them to cheat and chat each other when they are answering the questions. It also wasted a time during answering the questions. Sometimes, the students made the noise when teaching and learning process was done. They didn’t ready toward the lesson.

Then, teacher has some efforts to overcome it. Teacher tried to make the situation and condition in listening activities becomes enjoyable and meaningful in order to the students have good participation in the classroom. For instance, teacher makes them be sure toward the texts before playing the record. Indeed, teacher make a game or quiz when the students answered the questions. Teacher tried to make them become enthusiasm and spirit in answering the questions orally.

Such as Mrs.Umini state: “I give the students some clues when they are difficult to answer the questions. I also make a game, one of them rise their hand fast in answering the questions, so that the listening learning not become bored.”[131]

      In listening activities, teacher made a game to persuade the students become active in learning process. Teacher gave the chance to them to give their opinion or answers. If one of them answered the questions right, teacher gives addition value or score and the other students give congratulation. The students rise their hand and answered the questions orally and the others listen and ready to answer too if the first students answered false. They compete each others in learning process.

77

CHAPTER IV

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

In this chapter, the writer discusses the result of the research which conducted in SMP 2 Ponorogo in eight grade of bilingual program in academic year 2014/2015 about teaching listening using communicative approach, the problems and teacher’s efforts in the using of communicative language teaching in teaching listening.

  1. The Implementation of CLT in Teaching Listening to the Eight Grade Students of Bilingual Program at SMP N 2 Ponorogo in Academic Year 2013/2014

Based on the result of interview and documentation that has done by the writer in SMP N 2 Ponorogo to the eight grade students of bilingual program, the writer could identify that teaching listening using communicative language teaching is used by teacher. In listening activities, firstly, teacher gives greeting to the students and pray together before conducting listening section. Teacher guided the students to explore their mind how far they understand toward the material that will be learnt first. Teacher doesn’t share the material directly, but teacher makes the students become sure throught the listening activities. In addition, teacher gives the model or examples related to the topic before listening activities are started. On the other hand, teacher also gives the leading questions that related to the students’ experience.

In this case, the writer think that teacher tried to persuade the students become active and interested toward the listening before starting the listening section. Teacher gives brainstorming ideas to the students in order to they didn’t confuse toward the material. Teacher guided them to the topic, so the students not become panic and nerveous when they faced some listening texts. Teacher also try to make the material become easy to be understood by the students by relating the students’ experiances in daily life. This makes the students are interested with the topic that will be listened from the record. Teacher should give the input more to the students in every meeting in the classroom. Teacher also ought to remembered the materials that has done before, so the students can easy to continue the next material. Input must be meaningful and comprehensible in order to the students knew about the English lesson.

Teaching listening must be meaningful to the students. They not only listen what the speaker meant from the record, but also they must know what the contents of the texts, because listening is active learning process. Listening activities should be done with the enjoyment situation, not pressing the students’ achievement in order to the students not become panic and nerveous when they must be faced with the spoken text which has most structure there. With listening, students know and add their knowledge and information from spoken texts.

From the result of documentation, there are steps or stages to teach communicative listening include Lead-in, teacher directs comprehension task, students listen for task, teacher directs feedback, students listen for task again, and teacher directs text-related task. The writer thinks that these steps can makes students become interested with listening activities. Teacher also became easy to explain the material because the steps have significance each others. The students can use their background knowledge when conducting listening activities. In Lead-in, teacher gives motivation and leading question related to the text before listening was done. The writer thinks that its one of technique to explore the students’ mind in order to they didn’t panic with the spoken text. In this case, motivation is very important to persuade them to learn English lesson actively, because if the students like to study English, they are easy to catch the material. On of way to persuade the students become active is leading question. Teacher asked to the students about their activity or experiences that should be related to the topic that will be learn in listening activities. Teacher tried to relate the questions with the material. Then, teacher explained the objectives of learning. The students must know the objective of learning, what should they do in teaching and learning process, what the lessons are at that time. After that, the students listen sound from the record.

In this case, teacher can manage how long the record will be played in listening section. The writer thinks that students are impossible to catch the meaning just one time, so that teacher can repeat the record about twice or three times. Teaching and learning become effective and efficient. After the students finished listening section, teacher asked to them if they have some difficulties during listening. Teacher also asked about the students’ answers. If the students still not completed the answers, teacher replayed the record one or twice to make them become sure.

The writer thinks that the teacher’s negotiation is very important, because teacher also as a facilitator in the classroom when the students found the problems or difficulties. The students also needed the attention more from teacher, so that  the students didn’t nerveous in learning. Finally, at the end of learning, teacher and the students discussed the result of learning. Teacher asked the students to express their answer by rising hand and explaining the words.

Based on the interview that conducted to the teacher of Eight grade students of bilingual program in SMP N 2 Ponorogo, teacher uses exploration before listening activities was started. Teacher doesn’t play the record directly and students listen it, but the students is guided to explore their mind toward the topic. The writer thinks that exploration becomes the right method in communicative approach when the teacher used it to teach listening. Teacher can explored their mind to guide their mind to the topic. Teacher in this case also should has psicologycal ability to instruct and set their condition become calm and enjoyable before listening activities are started. Teacher makes them  becomes sure toward the text that will be faced by them, so it can help the students are interested and concentrate on the lesson. This technique also can makes the students didn’t panic when they must be faced the new spoken text and teacher can managed their situation and condition becomes conducive.

In communicative approach, the students answered toward the questions orally. They don’t write their answer in whiteboard, but they read their answer and spell the word one by one to get the correct answer. Teacher gives the opportunities to them to share their idea and the other students listen and attent what the correct answer. In this case, the writer thinks that listening activities also integrate with the other skills such as speaking, reading. This helps students become active in listening process. They not become passive toward the teaching and learning process. Teacher also can know their speaking skill rather than listening. Indeed, students in communicative class are also demanded ultimately have to use the language productively and receptively. Classroom tasks must therefore equipt students with the skills necessary for communication in those contexts. Its also one of the principles of communicative teaching that learning must be done by doing, so that the students don’t passive in learning.

In teaching listening using communicative approach, teacher is as a facilitator in teaching learning process. Teacher also as a guidance when the students found the difficulties in their learning process. So, the students can do listening activities clearly. In this case, the writer thinks that teacher just serves and helps them when they are difficult to understand the texts even the questions related to the text. In addition, the learning is focused on students centre. The students can use their background knowledge to help their learning process in listening activities. So, teacher just observes and walks around the class when the students listen the record. In this case, teacher just helps them when they found the difficulty toward the contents and questions. In this case, teacher also should use positive feedback. For example, teacher demonstrated the behavior by agreeing, praising, or showing understanding. Teacher must respect about their answer in order to they can correct the answer by spirit, so that they are not pressured with the teacher’ corrective feedback. Teacher also must be tolerant of students’ errors as they indicate that the students are building their communicative competence.

  1. The Problems and Teacher’s Efforts to Overcome the Problems in the Using of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Teaching Listening to the Eight Grade Students of Bilingual Program at SMP N 2 Ponorogo in Academic Year 2013/2014

 

Teaching and learning process also has some difficulties when teacher used their approach/method/technique in their class. This is caused by some aspects either from students mistakes or teacher itself. In teaching listening using communicative approach, teacher found some problems when conducting listening activities such as low students’ background knowledge. Most of students don’t know about the content of the text. They still understand the sentence word by word, so that if they don’t know the next sentence, they repeat the previous sentence to understand more again. Indeed, they are rare to read the English literature books. When the students are faced the material, they are confused to understand the word. Teacher has efforts to overcome the problems. Teacher try to introduce the new vocabulary to them related to the text. Teacher wrote about the ten difficult words in each materials. The students must find the meaning each words before reading the listening text. They can open their dictionary to find it. Indeed, teacher also gives the model to them before listening activities and explains the topic of the material before the students listen the sound from the record.

From this problem, the writer think that students still has less of knowledge because they are still eight grade students. Sometimes they dont know what the topic. Students should read more about the English literature, so that they can add some knowledge from other books. They should also understand other lessons. The writer also thinks that the teacher’s efforts can makes the students are easy to understand the content of the text. The students become active in searching new words in their dictionary, so that they can add their vocabulary in understanding the text. They also have spirit to learn English lesson. But, beside that they must study more about vocabulary. They can make some notes that written in notebook, so when they don’t know the difficult word, they can open their written. They also can bring everywhere they want to memorize it.

The second problems are teacher should use English as much as possible when they give instruction and explanation to the students. Teacher as a model for the students, so teacher used more English language carefully when taught in the classroom. The teacher’s teaching must become meaningful for students that can make the students are motivated to speak English in the classroom. Communicative teaching is a new challenge for teacher when teacher wanted to teach meaningfully in the classroom. Teacher studied about lesson plan and try to speak clearly before teaching in the classroom. Teacher also studied about pronounciation in order to when teacher gave some instruction to the students, teacher can pronounce well and right.

In this case, the writer thinks that the teacher is demanded to use English language more. Teacher must give the right speech to the students in order to teacher is not joked with the students in learning. On the other hand, teacher should give the best performance in the classroom, so that teaching and learning become effective. Indeed, the writer thinks that teacher must has good performance when teacher taught the lesson in the classroom. This also can improve the teacher’s teaching skill. If teacher has good attitude, the students will imitate what teacher do in the classroom. So, its good way that teacher needed for study before teaching in the classroom. The institute should give some trainings to all English teachers in order to they can teach English effectively. For example, teacher must be given training or seminar about how to teach and speak well in the classroom. Teacher also must study more, because teacher is figure in education institute. Some native speakers can give good contribution in English language education. If teacher doesn’t have professional in teaching, so that teaching and learning will be bored.

The third problems are the students’ answers toward the questions are orally. The students rise their hand when they answered the questions one by one. They must pronounce the word or vocabulary fluently and right. Some students are still wrong when they pronounced the word. They are not bahaved to speak English in anytime, anywhere, they meet their friends. So that, teacher gives some clues to persuade them try to answer the questions correctly by explaining the word. Teacher interacts with the students when they answer the questions. Teacher explained the word by giving simulation or examples related to the word and students try to guest that word. Beside that, teacher gives chances to other students to answer the question. This activity is done step by step to get the right answers. If the students have finished their answer, then they spell the word. This method also helped the students to study about pronounciation. This is clear that this approach makes them to communicate each other in learning process, so that they understand what the right answer related to the texts. This solution also makes the students to think before answering. They must consider about what should the students do before acting.

In this case, the writer thinks that the students are still lack of pronounciation and spelling the word. Sometimes, the sound from the record is difficult to catch right, so that when the students answered the questions, they are still confused. English also may be deemed irrelevant with the students’ needs because the language is not part of their everyday life. They not behave to use English language when they spoke, talk, or chat with their friend in the classroom. Beside that, they are still not confident with theirselves when they want to express their idea or speak English in front of the classroom. Indeed, teacher used a way to help the students try to answer correctly and fluently. Teacher can interact together in learning. This also can create and build the communicative teaching and learning in the classroom. Teacher can give speaking training to improve their pronounciation outside classroom.

The fourth problems are low students’ participation toward the lesson in the class. Most of them often didn’t focus and didn’t give attention toward the listening section. During the lesson, the students often doing the other activities that can makes the learning becomes noisy. They also make the noise by talking each others during listening activities, so that they don’t understand about the content of the texts that given by teacher and they feel bored and tired because of hearing the sound waves. Then, teacher tried to make the situation and condition in listening activities become enjoyable and meaningful in order to the students have good participation in the classroom. Teacher makes a game in order to they become active in learning process.

In this case, the writer think that the problems rise when the students not enthusiam with listening section first, so when the students listen the sound they felt bored and tired. They still have low intrinsic motivation in doing listening section. They still depend with others. For example, when the students are offered by teacher try to find the new vocabulary, most of them are still lazy to open their dictionary. Teacher must has the way to help them become focus and happy in listening activities. Students also have less of background knowledge that caused them felt difficult to understand the text. Indeed, the writer thinks that this solution can makes the students study actively than before. They becomes conscious and curious to know what the content of the texts. The students can share their idea or answer each other toward the game, so that they are happy doing listening activities. Teacher can asked the students to make a group to share their answers, making negotiation to find the right answers, so that the listening activities have the good atmosphere in the classroom. On the other hand, this show that their learning in the class was done by cooperative and collaborative learning. They can shared their idea each others to discuss the right answers.

88

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

 

  1. Conclusion

This research focused on teaching listening using communicative language teaching (CLT) to the eight grade students of bilingual program in SMP N 2 Ponorogo in academic year 2014/2014. Based on the research findings and discussion, the writer concluded that:

  1. The using of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in teaching listening is that teacher gave the exploration first before listening activities was conducted in the classroom. Teacher didn’t share the material directly, but teacher and the students discuss and negotiate toward the topic that related to the text. Teacher also gave the examples to direct the student in order to they know what the topic that will be listened at that time, so they didn’t become panic and nervous. There are some stages to teach communicative listening in the classroom as following as: Lead-in, teacher directs comprehension task, students listen for task, teacher gives the feedback, students listen sound again, and teacher directs text-related task. In listening, teacher as a facilitator and guidance in teaching and learning that teacher just helped and monitored their learning. The materials are given to the students are authentic texts that include the native speaker.
  2. Teacher has some difficulties when they used the Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in teaching listening. These problems are coming from some aspects such as the low students’ background knowledge toward the text, teacher is demanded to use English language as much as and as well as possible in giving instruction and explanation because teacher also as a model for the students’ advance, the students answered the questions orally, and students’ participation in listening activities are less. Indeed, teacher has some efforts to overcome those problems in the using of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in teaching listening as follows: teacher gives exploration to guide the students’ mind in order to easy to understand the text and asked them to find the difficult words from the text, teacher studied speaking and lesson plan before teaching, teacher gives some clues to persuade them try to answer the questions correctly by explaining the word, and  teacher tried to make the situation and condition in listening activities become enjoyable and meaningful in order to the students have good participation in the classroom.

  1. Recommendation
  2. For Institution

SMP N 2 Ponorogo school should encourage and support the English teachers to use Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in teaching to increase and improve their teaching, especially in teaching listening. Besides, the institution should hold regular meeting with English teachers in order to discuss about the problems that faced in teaching and to find out the best solutions.

  1. For Teachers

Listening is basic skill that students must comprehend it. In learning process, the students face some difficulties when they listen the sound from the record. Indeed, the students didn’t interest with listening, so they feel bored in learning. Therefore, teachers should use the appropriate approach to teach listening course in order to the teacher can motivated them and made the situation and condition became comfortable in listening activities. One of the ways that  teachers can do is by applying Communicative Language Teaching (CLT). Teachers can guide and facilitate in learning process by giving motivation and exploration related to the listening activities, so the students can concentrate on the lesson and they feel interested with the listening activities.

  1. For the Other Researchers

The other researchers should use Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in teaching English language in the classroom, especially in teaching listening, because this approach is suitable to persuade the students become active and enjoyable in teaching and learning process.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 

 

Arikunto, Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2002.

Barclay, Lizbeth A. Learning to Listen/ Learning to Learn: Teaching Listening Skills to Students with Visual Impairments. New York: AFB Press, 2012.

Brandl, Klaus. Communicative Language Teaching in Action: Putting Principles to Work. Washington: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007.

Brown, H. Douglas. Priciples of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Pearson Education, Inc, 2007.

Brown, H. Douglas. Teaching by Priciples: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Logman, 2001.

Brown, Gillian. Teaching the Spoken Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

Brown, Steven. Teaching Listening. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Creswell, John W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2009.

Clifford, Collette. Nursing and Health Care Research: A Skills-based Introduction. New York: Routledge, 2013.

Elaine R. Monsen and Linda Van Hom. Research Successful Approach. United States of America: American Dietetic Association, 2008.

Field, John. Listening in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Flowerdew, John. Second Language Listening Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Harmer, Jeremy. The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman Group Ltd, 1991.

Hedge, Tricia. Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

John Flowerdew & Lindsay Miller. Second Language Listening: Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Junadi, Purnawan. Pengantar Analisis Data. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1995.

Khotari, C. R. Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd, 2004.

Larsen Freeman, Diane. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Linse, Caroline T. Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners. New York: McGraw Hill, 2005.

Littlewood, William. Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

Margot Ely etc. Doing Qualitative Research: Circles within Circles. London: Falmer Press, 1991.

Matthew B Miles and Michael Huberman. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. California: Sage Publication, 1994.

Moleong, Lexy. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2009.

Mukul Gupta and Deepa Gupta.  Research Methodology. New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited, 2011.

Neuman, William Lawrence. Sosial Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon, 2000.

Nunan, David. Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Nunan, David. Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. United Kingdom: Prentice Hall International Ltd, 1991.

Nunan, David. Practical English Language Teaching. New York: McGraw Hill, 2003.

Omagio Hadley, Alice. Teaching Language in Contect: 2nd edition. Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers, 1993.

Parrish, Betsy. Teaching Adult ESL a Practical Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2004.

Ricards, Jack C. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001

Ricard, Jack C. Communicative Language Teaching Today. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Ricard, Jack C. Teaching Listening and Speaking: From Theory to Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Robert C. Bogdan and  Sari Knopp Biklen. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Nedham Heights: Allyn and Bacon, 1992.

Saldana, Johnny. Fundamentals of Qualitative Research: Understanding Qualitative Research. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Savignon, Sandra J. Interpreting Communicative Language Teaching: Contexts and Concerns in Teacher Education. London: Yale University Press, 2002.

Seidman, Irving. Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education & the Social Sciences. New York: Teachers College Press, 2013.

Wendy A Scott and Lisbeth H. Ytreberg. Teaching English to Children. New York: Logman, 1992.

William L. Goodwin & Laura D Goodwin. Understanding Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Early Chilhood Education. New York: Teachers College Press, 1996.

Elwell, Phillip. The Push Towards Communicative Language Teaching and Its Impact on the Korean Classroom. Germany: GRIN verlag, 2011) .http://www.grin.com/en/e-book/182284/The-Push-Towards-Communicative-Language-Teaching-and-Its-Impact-on-the-Korean-Classroom. Accessed on May 21, 2014.

Flohr, Susanne. Teaching Listening and Speaking. Germany: GRIN Verlag, 2006. http://www.grin.com/en/e-book/142928/teaching-listening-and-speaking.com. Accessed on May 21, 2014.

Mansour Khoosa and Mashoume Yakhabi, Problems Associated with the Use of Communicative Language Teaching in EFL Contexts and Possible Solutions. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (online), jilid 63-76, No.1 Tahun 2012. http://jfl.iaun.ac.ir/article_4185_0.html, accessed on June 26, 2014).

Tsinghong Ma. An Emqirical Study on Teaching Listening in CLT. International Education Studies Journal, (online), jilid 2, No.2 Tahun 2009. http//www. ccsenet.org/journal.html. Accessed on April 29, 2014).

Vickie A. Lambert & Clinton E. Lambert. Qualitative Descriptive Research: An Acceptable Design. Jurnal of Nursing Research, (online), Jilid 16, No.4 Tahun 2012. http://HYPERLINK “http://www/”www.tci-thaijo.org, accessed on April 29, 2014).

Zekariya Ozsevik. The Use Of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT): Turkish EFL Teacher’s Perceiced Difficulties In Implementing CLT In Turkey. (Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, 2010), 44. http://www.ideals.illinois.edu/ozsevik_zakariya.pdf, accessed on April 29, 2014).

       [1] Susanne Flohr, Teaching Listening and Speaking, (Germany: GRIN Verlag, 2006), 3. http://www.grin.com/en/e-book/142928/teaching-listening-and-speaking.com. Accessed on May 21, 2014.

       [2] Ibid.

       [3] Alice Omagio Hadley, Teaching Language in Contect: 2nd edition,  (Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers, 1993), 169.

       [4] Steven Brown, Teaching Listening, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 2.

       [5] Susanne Flohr, Teaching Listening and Speaking, 4.

       [6] John Field, Listening in the Language Classroom, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 13.

       [7] Ibid.

       [8] David Nunan, Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers, (United Kingdom: Prentice Hall International Ltd, 1991), 24.

       [9] Wendy A Scott and Lisbeth H. Ytreberg, Teaching English to Children, (New York: Logman, 1992), 22.

       [10] Jack C. Ricard, Communicative Language Teaching Today, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 2.

        [11] Caroline T. Linse, Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners, (New York: McGraw Hill, 2005), 56.

        [12] Sandra J. Savignon, Interpreting Communicative Language Teaching: Contexts and Concerns In Teacher Education, (London: Yale University Press, 2002), 1.

       [13] John Flowerdew & Lindsay Miller, Second Language Listening: Theory and Practice, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 12.

       [14] Ibid.

       [15] Diane Larsen Freeman, Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 121.

       [16] Jack C. Ricard, Communicative Language Teaching Today, 9.

       [17] Diane Larsen Freeman, Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching, 129.

       [18] Tricia Hedge, Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), 67.

       [19] Zekariya Ozsevik, “The Use Of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT): Turkish EFL Teacher’s Perceiced Difficulties In Implementing CLT In Turkey, “ (Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, 2010), 44. http://www.ideals.illinois.edu/ozsevik_zakariya.pdf. Accessed on April 29, 2014).

       [20] John W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, (California: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2009), 3.

       [21] Ibid.

       [22] Elaine R. Monsen and Linda Van Hom, Research Successful Approach, (United States of America: American Dietetic Association, 2008), 5.

       [23] William L. Goodwin & Laura D Goodwin, Understanding Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Early Chilhood Education, (New York: Teachers College Press, 1996), 33.

       [24] Collette Clifford, Nursing and Health Care Research: A Skills-based Introduction, (New York: Routledge, 2013), 79.

       [25] John W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4.

       [26] Johnny Saldana, Fundamentals of Qualitative Research: Understanding Qualitative Research, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), 3.

       [27] Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln, Handbook of Qualitative Research, (California: SAGE Publications Inc, 1994), 1-2.

       [28] Vickie A. Lambert & Clinton E. Lambert. Qualitative Descriptive Research: An Acceptable Design. Jurnal of Nursing Research, (online), Jilid 16, No.4 Tahun 2012. http://www.tci-thaijo.org, Accessed on April 29, 2014).

       [29] Ibid.

       [30] Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln, Handbook of Qualitative Research, 379.

       [31] Sumber data adalah subjek darimana data dapat diperoleh. Look on, Suharsimi Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, (Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2002), 81.

       [32] C. R. Khotari, Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, (New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd, 2004), 95.

       [33] Mukul Gupta and Deepa Gupta, Research Methodology,  (New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited, 2011), 59.

       [34] Sumber data utama dalam penelitian adalah kata-kata dan tindakan, selebihnya adalah tambahan seperti dokumen dan lainnya. Look on, Lexy Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2009), 157.

       [35] C.R.Khotari. Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, 95.

       [36] Ibid.,111.

       [37] Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln, Handbook of Qualitative Research, 392.

       [38] Dokumen adalah setiap bahan tertulis ataupun film, lain dari record, yang tidak dipersiapkan karena adanya permintaan seorang penyidik. Look on, Lexy Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif , 161.

       [39] Dokumentasi, dari asal katanya dokumen, yang artinya barang-barang tertulis. Di dalam melaksanakan metode dokumentasi, peneliti menyelidiki benda-benda tertulis seperti buku-buku, majalah, dokumen, peraturan-peraturan, notulen rapat, catatan harian, dan sebagainya. Look on, Suharsimi Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, (Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2002), 158.

       [40] Margot Ely etc, Doing Qualitative Research: Circles within Circles, (London: Falmer Press, 1991), 58.

       [41]  Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln, Handbook of Qualitative Research, 353.

       [42] Johnny Saldana, Fundamentals of Qualitative Research: Understanding Qualitative Research, 32.

       [43] Irving Seidman, Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education & the Social Sciences, (New York: Teachers College Press, 2013), 9.

       [44] Robert C. Bogdan and  Sari Knopp Biklen, Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods, (Nedham Heights: Allyn and Bacon, 1992), 153.

       [45] Purnawan Junadi, Pengantar Analisis Data, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1995), 2.

       [46] John W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 184.

       [47] Matthew B Miles and Michael Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, (California: Sage Publication, 1994), 10.

       [48] Ibid.

       [49] Ibid.,11.

       [50] Ibid.,11.

       [51] Ibid.,12.

       [52] Keabsahan data merupakan konsep penting yang diperbaharui dari konsep kesahihan (validitas) dan keandalan (reliabilitas). Look on, Lexy J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif , 171.

       [53] Triangulasi adalah teknik pemeriksaan keabsahan data yang memanfaatkan sesuatu yang lain di luar data itu untuk keperluan pengecekan atau sebagai pembanding terhadap data itu. Look on, Lexy J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif , 178.

       [54] William Lawrence Neuman, Sosial Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, (Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon, 2000), 124.

       [55] H. Douglas Brown, Priciples of Language Learning and Teaching, (New York: Pearson Education, Inc, 2007), 8.

       [56] Ibid.

       [57] H. Douglas Brown, Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, (New York: Addison Wesley Longman, 2001), 247.

       [58] David Nunan, Practical English Language Teaching, (New York: McGraw Hill, 2003), 24.

       [59] William Littlewood, Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 67.

       [60] Lizbeth A. Barclay, Learning to Listen/ Learning to Learn: Teaching Listening Skills to Students with Visual Impairments, (New York: AFB Press, 2012), 4.

         [61] Susanne Flohr, Teaching Listening and Speaking, 3.

        [62] William Littlewood, Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction, 67.

        [63] H. Douglas Brown, Teaching by Principles: An Intective Approach to Language Pedagogy, 249.

        [64] Jack C. Ricard, Teaching Listening and Speaking: From Theory to Practice, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 3.

       [65] Susanne Flohr, Teaching Listening and Speaking, 4.

       [66] John Field, Listening in the Language Classroom, 13.

       [67] Gillian Brown, Teaching the Spoken Language, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), 56.

       [68] Steven Brown, Teaching Listening, 2.

       [69] David Nunan, Practical English Language Teaching, 26.

       [70] David Nunan, Language Teaching Methodology, (New York: London: Prentice Hall, 1991), 18.

       [71] John Flowerdew, Second Language Listening Theory and Practice, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 25.

       [72] Steven Brown, Teaching Listening, 2.

       [73] Tsinghong Ma. An Emqirical Study on Teaching Listening in CLT. International Education Studies Journal, (online), jilid 2, No.2 Tahun 2009. http//www. ccsenet.org/journal.html, Accessed on April 29, 2014).

       [74] David Nunan, Language Teaching Methodology, 26

       [75] Ibid.,27.

      [76] Ibid.

       [77] Phillip Elwell, The Push Towards Communicative Language Teaching and Its Impact on the Korean Classroom (Germany: GRIN verlag, 2011),3.http://www.grin.com/en/e-book/182284/The-Push-Towards-Communicative-Language-Teaching-and-Its-Impact-on-the-Korean-Classroom. Accessed on May 21, 2014.

       [78] Betsy Parrish, Teaching Adult ESL A Practical Introduction, (New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, 2004), 31.

       [79]Jack C. Richard, Communicative Language Teaching Today, 2.

       [80] Diane Larsen Freeman, Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 129.

       [81] Jeremy Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching, (London: Longman Group Ltd, 1991), 84.

       [82] Klaus Brandl, Communicative Language Teaching in Action: Putting Principles to Work, (Washington: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007), 5.

       [83] Jack C. Ricards, Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, 155.

       [84] Diane Larsen Freeman, Techniques and Principles In Language Teaching, 130.

       [85] Ibid.

       [86] Ibid.,132.

       [87] Jack C. Ricards, Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, 158.

       [88] H. Douglas Brown, Teaching by Priciples: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, 43.

       [89] Klaus Brandl, Communicative Language Teaching in Action: Putting Principles to Work, 7.

       [90] Klaus Brandl, Communicative Language Teaching in Action: Putting Principles to Work, 12.

       [91] Klaus Brandl, Communicative Language Teaching in Action: Putting Principles to Work, 21.

       [92] Jack Richard, Communicative Language Teaching Today , 13.

       [93] Betsy Parrish, Teaching Adult ESL A Practical Introduction, 32.

       [94] Jack C. Richard, Communicative Language Teaching Today, 5.

       [95] Diane Larsen Freeman, Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching, 128.

       [96] Jack Richard, Communicative Language Teaching Today, 5.

       [97] Zekariya Ozsevik, “The Use Of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT): Turkish EFL Teacher’s Perceiced Difficulties In Implementing CLT In Turkey, 43. Accesses on April 29, 2014

       [98] Ibid.

       [99] David Nunan, Designing Tasks for The Communicative Classroom, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 87.

       [100] H. Douglas Brown, Teaching by Priciples: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy,  (New York: Logman, 2001), 44.

       [101] Ibid.

       [102] Tricia Hedge, Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom, 70.

       [103] Ibid.

       [104] Zekariya Ozsevik, “The Use of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT): Turkish EFL Teacher’s Perceiced Difficulties In Implementing CLT In Turkey, 44.

       [105] Ibid.

       [106] Mansour Khoosa and Mashoume Yakhabi, Problems Associated with the Use of Communicative Language Teaching in EFL Contexts and Possible Solutions. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (online), jilid 63-76, No.1 Tahun 2012. http://jfl.iaun.ac.ir/article_4185_0.html, accessed on June 26, 2014).

       [107] Ibid.

       [108] Ibid.

       [109] Tricia Hedge, Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom, 71

        [110] Ibid.

       [111] Ibid.

      [112] Mansour Khoosa and Mashoume Yakhabi, Problems Associated with the Use of Communicative Language Teaching in EFL Contexts and Possible Solutions. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (online), jilid 63-76, No.1 Tahun 2012. http://jfl.iaun.ac.ir/article_4185_0.html, accessed on June 26, 2014).

       [113] Ibid.

       [114] Lutfiana Kusuma Wardani, Teaching Listening Using TOEIC Oriented Program For The Twelfth Grade Accountancy’s Students Of SMKN 1 Ponorogo In Academic Year 2010/2011 (Ponorogo: STAIN PO, 2011), 70.

       [115] Widya Dwi Astuti S.A, Teaching Listening Comprehension Using Song Dictation Qualitative Research in MA AL-Mawaddah Ponorogo (Ponorogo: STAIN PO, 2011), 72.

       [116]  See Apendix 2

       [117]  See Apendix 1

       [118] See Apendix 2

       [119] See Apendix 2

       [120] See Apendix 2

       [121] See Apendix 2

       [122] See Apendix 2

       [123] See Apendix 2

       [124] See Apendix 2

       [125] See Apendix 2

       [126] See Apendix 2

       [127] See Apendix 2

       [128] See Apendix 2

       [129] See Apendix 2

       [130] See Apendix 2

       [131] See Apendix 2

AUDIO-VISUAL AIDS AS MEDIA IN TEACHING OF WRITING IN ESL CLASSROOM

 AUDIO-VISUAL AIDS AS MEDIA IN TEACHING OF WRITING IN ESL CLASSROOM

Adhan Kholis

15716251009

English Education Department of Post Graduate Program at State University of Yogyakarta

Email: adhank74@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT

      Since many approaches, strategies, and methods in language teaching have developed from year to year and been implemented unsuccessfully by teachers in learning processes, the idea that teacher should consider the new strategy in language teaching has arisen in language learning. One of which is through using media as the one way to help students learn the English effectively and easily. Teacher can combine between audio and visual in teaching English skills. For instance, in teaching writing, both students and teachers get a beneficial thing in using it in language teaching, because audio visual can facilitate teacher in conveying the material. It also makes teaching and learning processes become meaningful and enjoyable. Writing processes are not only focused on put some words on a piece of paper, but also allowed students to make sentences more meaningful and communicative. To do this, students can understand more in writing and build a lot of sentences easily by using audio visual aids. Audio visual aids persuade students to express their thought, mind, and even the students’ imagination. Students learn more creative and critical in learning.

      In reference to the teaching writing through audio-visual aids, this paper attempts to explore more the theoretical framework of the using of audio-visual in teaching writing to ESL Students.

Keyword: Audio-Visual Aids, Writing, Teaching Writing.

  1. INTRODUCTION

In ELT (English language teaching), from year to year, the English teaching methodology has developed in nature. Some methods in teaching have been implemented by teachers in teaching and learning process in order to produce the successfully learning activity. A long time ago, the most approaches used by teacher in teaching only focused on teacher-centered learning or we can call it as behaviorist approach. Students are still passive in learning. They just listen to what the teachers say and imitate what the teachers do in learning activity. Many drillings are given by teacher in teaching. Therefore, the result of that learning is still far of success.  Modern trends have changed the view of educational world that demands each educator to be creative in explaining the material in the classroom. The teacher must develop their approach, methods, and technique in teaching, because the learners also need to be actively involved in learning activity or we can say it as learner-centered learning. These approaches are used in Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) that attempts learners to be active in learning, using language communicatively. In this approach, teachers are demanded to use some authentic materials in teaching. The use of authentic materials allows the class activity to be a real communication in teaching. Teachers are encouraged to use some media including audio and visual in nature, in order that the teaching and learning process becomes interesting and enjoyable. For instance, in teaching writing that is considered as the difficult skills in English language. In writing, the language learners must produce a new knowledge or language. They should use their thought, idea, mind, even psychology aspect in creating a correct writing. In order to achieve the objectives of writing, teachers can use audio visual aids to help students write sentences easily and make teaching and learning processes becomes interesting and enjoyable.

 

The development of education also demanded teacher to think what he or she do to make the teaching and learning become interesting and effective. The main point making teachers also use audio visual aids is the modern English education. It is different from the past, because now in learning, students must study actively, creatively, independently, and allows students to explore their mind, idea, and opinion.

A resourceful English language learning classroom with audio visual aids is helpful for effective language learning. Studies indicate that visual aids improve the effectiveness of teaching learning process in a classroom (Joshi, 1995 & Vissa, 1994 in Ghazala, 2013: 11). The term of Audio-visual refers to the instructional media consisting of hearing and seeing activities. It means that a text book or reference material is not fall in this material. Audio-visual aid allows students to learn actively and to pay attention to the material, because they use their eye and ear in learning together.

 

  1. SCOPE and DEFINITION

 

Webster’s Encyclopedia Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, defines Audio visual aids “as training or educational materials directed at both the sense of hearing and the sense of sight, films, recordings, photographs used in classroom instruction, library collections or the likes”. There are still a number of definitions asserted by many experts in defining audio visual in nature. According to (Anzaku in Ashaver et all., 2013: 44) in the term of audio-visual materials is generally used to refer to those instructional materials that may be used to declare meaning without complete dependence upon verbal symbols or language. In this case, the term of audio-visual aids is more associated by some instructional materials used by teacher or educator in the classroom. Those materials consist of any hearing and seeing activities in nature. Such as (Dike in Ashaver et all., 2013: 44) states that some materials used in audio-visual related to any information through the sense of hearing as in audio resources, sight, as in visual resources or through a combination of senses.

In other definitions is proposed by (Hiral, 2015: 92), urging that audio-visual includes seeing and understanding processes allowing students to express their mind to do what they are being asked to do. She also mentions that audio materials are a text that can be heard and recorded in tape, CD, or DVD player. Any recorded dialogue, speech, song, music can be audio materials for language classroom. On the other hand, visual aids can be seen such as pictures, poster, graphics, videos, charts, and flash cards. Thus, from some definitions above, a text book or a reference material does not include to those instructional materials. Based on (Mathew, 2013: 87) proposes that audio-visual aids are different tools from others used for presentation and abstract information in the classroom.

Dike (1993) grouped audio-visual materials into: Audio resources such as records, tapes and cassettes, and radio broadcasts. Visual resources including models, real objects, three dimensional displays, the chalkboard, bulletin board, adhesives, graphs, diagrams, charts, maps, cartons, posters and pictures and projected forms like transparencies, slides, filmstrips and films. Audio-visual combinations consist of film and filmstrips, slides-tape decks, television programs, videotapes and dramatization. Here, computer software can be seen as both visual and audio in some case. It can be used by teacher in teaching writing.  Dwyer’s (2007) and Becker’s (1998) suggest that most teachers, especially primary teachers, use computers for giving drills and practicing activities, many of the writing programs are open ended and allowed for exploratory learning.

From the explanation above, it can be concluded that audio visual resources are divided into audio visual and a combination of audio and visual resources and others which are class with audio-visual resources which can either be in a projected or non-projected forms.

 

  1. TYPES OF AUDIO-VISUAL MATERIALS

 

Teaching becomes monotonous in the classroom when the teachers just use a text book as the one source in learning. For instance, in behaviorist approach, in this case, teaching is mostly considered as teacher-centered learning. The dominant activities are imitation. Students imitate what the teachers say in the learning. This just make the students become passive in the classroom. In Mathew and Alidmat’s (2013) study explored that the use of audio-visual aids helps the language teacher in ELT (English Language Teaching). The result of their study stated that the use of audio visual can help both students and teacher in teaching and learning process.

In some case, there are many types of audio-visual materials in teaching. Some of which can be used by teacher in teaching as follow:

 

  1. Filmstrips and Slide

Filmstrips and Slide are among the most economical of Audio Visual materials (Allen, 1956: 131). Film is media consisting of hearing and seeing processes in nature. Film can also give the teachers a traditional and structured discussion. It is simple by using film in teaching. It can be set based on what the teacher wants. Film is readily accessible in that it can be bought, rented, or borrowed from libraries, schools, or private institution. (Stampolis and Sewell in Allen, 1956: 132) on their study compared the use of four filmstrips with lectures in teaching economic concepts to university students. The result shows that only the filmstrips are suitable for lecture method, no differences existing in the remaining three cases. Film allows students enter into a whole range of other communication worlds: they see how difference people stand when they talk to each other or what sort of food people eat (Harmer, 2001: )  Unspoken rules of behavior in social and business situations are easier to see on film than to describe in a book or hear on a audio track.

  1. Video Compact Disc (VCD)

The other types of audio-visual aids are video compact disc. It is also similar to film that consists of hearing and seeing activities in nature. But, it also has some differences. Unlike an event recorded on film, video tape can be played back immediately for analysis. It can be set fast. Video compact disc has a lot of advantages of being portable, cheap, and visible in a lighted room. Harmer (2001) declares that the use of video in class is just listening with “pictures”. In recent years, the use of video in English classes has developed rapidly as a result of the increasing emphasis on communicative techniques. Being a rich and valuable resource, video is well-liked by both students and teachers (Hemei in Ismail, 2006: 2). Many students like it because video is interesting, challenging, and stimulating to watch. Video can promote comprehension in learning. Indeed, in a video, the viewer is seeing the results of the writing, not just reading or hearing them as in print and radio. Writing for video is a complex subject about which many books have written (Timothy: 2006).

There are many reasons why some teachers are more interested in choosing video (Harmer, 2001: 282) such as: (1) the students do not just hear language, they also see it (2) video uniquely allows students to look at situations far beyond their classroom (3) when students use video cameras themselves, they are given the potential to create something memorable and enjoyable (4) students are motivated when they have chance to hear and look a new language from video.

  1. Internet and YouTube

Internet and You tube are also one of the audio visual aids types. Most of people in the world now know that internet is useful for education in some case, especially for students when they get some online task from teachers. Through internet, students can do browsing activities as much as possible they want to watch. For instance, when the students want to watch advertisement products in google, automatically they get it fast. They just determine the key word taped in google search engine. They can read and hear some a new language program. Another important difference presented by the Internet is that the quality of presentation of information is not necessarily a clue as to the quality of the content the way it might be with a print publication (Rijlaarsdam: 1993).

You Tube is also part of audio visual media. It gives a lot of advantages that allows students to watch and hear some video as long as they want. But, when students decide to choose YouTube as one of way to learn some materials, they should spend more time and a lot of money, because both internet and you tube are primarily connected by online. YouTube provides a good illustration for people when they are watching some video. YouTube functions as a platform that shares video, but accessing the site and becoming a participant depend on knowledge of writing and related symbolic systems.

  1. Television

Allen (1956) states that educational television has received the most concentrated study of any of the Audio Visual materials during the past several years. TV instruction was found to be just as effective as regular classroom instruction in teaching training subject. Today, many programs on TV have developed from year to year whether educational channel programs or commercial ones. Indeed, on TV serves a lot of advertisement that can be seen directly. It also has some advantages in practice. Through TV, people can know some issues being occurred in real life on TV news. They also get knowledge in some case.

 

  1. AUDIO-VISUAL IN ESL CLASSROOM

 

Today, English second language is considered as a language learned by the learners in the teaching and learning processes after the first language or mother tongue. English language has put the important role for people to survive in the world, especially for students in school education. But, in fact, many of students still have difficulties in learning English. It is caused by some reasons addressed may be for an ineffective teaching, students’ lack motivation, an uninterested teaching, or even lack of facilitation in teaching. From those problems, teacher can determine a new way to solve it. Today, for instance, teacher can uses media in teaching. In some case, many teachers apply the more strategies and approach in teaching English. For instance, Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) allowing students to use English language communicatively in nature. It is one of the popular language teaching approaches in the recent time. It was introduced in the early 1980s. In this approach, teachers are demanded to use some authentic materials in teaching. The use of authentic materials allows the class activity to be a real communication in teaching. Teachers are encouraged to use some media including audio and visual in nature, in order that the teaching and learning process becomes interesting and enjoyable. The students can learn easily by using media. Indeed, it also allows teacher to explain materials easily. Teachers no longer use their energy in delivering the materials. In teaching of English, the teacher uses the direct method. Thus, it is for the teacher to give a clear idea to the students through audio-visual aids.

According to (Hiral, 2015: 92) on her study indicates that audio-visual aids can be implemented in all skills of English (such as listening, speaking, reading, and writing) language to make it interesting for students in learning some English materials. Furthermore, the role of audio-visual has made the students to be creative in learning, because in this case, the role of teachers is just guiding and facilitating in teaching. All activities are mostly done by the students in the classroom by media. In ESL classroom, the using of audio visual aids not only as a source of help for teachers, but also provided a stimulus variation. Audio visual also helps teacher in psychology aspect (Gopal in Ashaver et all., 2013: 45). Teacher can easily manage the classroom’s complex situation and condition, because most of classroom atmospheres are noisy and makes teacher may become down.

 

  1. AUDIO-VISUAL IN TEACHING OF WRITING

 

Teaching writing is the last skill taught in English language learning. Penny (1991) states that the purpose of writing, in principle, is the expression of ideas, the conveying of a messages to the reader, so that the ideas themselves should arguably be seen as the most important aspect of the writing. The writer also considered the aspect of writing process such as neat handwriting, correct spelling and punctuation, as well as acceptable grammar and vocabulary. Over the past few decades of research on teaching writing to second language learners, a number of issues have appeared, some of which are composing the new product of writing, process of writing, contrastive rethoric, etc. In process of writing, the students is demanded not only to put some words on a piece of paper, but also to create writing more communicatively and meaningful by using good word, phrase, and structures. They should also use their thought, mind, and idea to build the good sentences. In this case, the aspect of psychology also plays a role in creating writing, because writing is a mental process to advance the students’ skill in creating some new knowledge. In order to make students become aware and easy to write some sentences, the role of teacher is also considered to help them in learning writing process. Teacher can teach writing communicatively in nature. The writing’s activities must be interesting and enjoyable. Teacher can decide the new approach and strategy when they want to teach writing easily. One of used strategies is by using instructional media. Since many English methodologies in language teaching and learning become controversy in practice, media can solve it. Teacher can combine audio and visual to be one part in teaching. In teaching writing with audio visual aids, the role of the teacher is just as a facilitator and guidance in learning.

The use of visual art is beneficial because it serve mainly as a motivational entry-point to reading and writing activities. These activities engage students in text and reinforce positive behavior (Burger and Winner, 2000; Ernst, 1994; 1995 in Nancy et all, 2005: 2). This is supported by the work of Gambrell (1993), (Gambrell & Bales, 1986), and Sadoski (1985) hypothesizing that the use of imagery goes beyond mere engagement. The picture or visual becomes the useful technique for helping students select and focus in developing a description which is non-chronological, for example of place, people, or scenes. Here, students can describe something from what they see on pictures and write it down on a piece of paper (Hedge, 2005: 70)

 

  1. THE PRINCIPLES FOR USE OF TEACHING AIDS

 

Teaching English by using audio visual aids should be properly considered first before applying it in teaching and learning processes. It is done because to make teaching become more effective and efficient. Such a following point below may be used by teacher in using audio visual aids (Daniel, 2013: 3813):

  1. Teaching by using audio visual should be associated in classroom teaching.
  2. Using some aids are only used for additional or complement the oral and written work in the teaching and learning processes.
  3. The teaching aid used should obey exact, accurate and real as far as practicable.
  4. The teacher should use a teaching aid only after a proper planning
  5. Teaching should see that a follow up program follows the lesson where in a teaching aid has been used.

 

  1. CONCLUSION

In reference to the above discussion, it is clear that the use of audio visual aids can be useful for teaching English, especially in teaching writing. Both teachers and students get some beneficial things in teaching and learning processes. Through audio visual in teaching writing, the students can be active in learning. Indeed, it also helps teachers explain some materials easily. Teacher no longer uses more energy in teaching. But, beside that, teachers should also consider the use of audio visual in teaching. Teacher can use some principles of the using audio visual in teaching.

 

 

          REFERENCES

Allen, William. Audio-Visual Materials. American Educational Research Association. Vol 26 No.2  1956. (pp. 125-135)

Andrzejczak, Nancy. From Image to Text: Using Images in Writing Process. International Journal of Education and the Arts. Vol 6 No 12. 2005

Ashaver,  Dhoosuur. The Use of Audio-Visual Materials in the Teaching and Learning Processes in Colleges of Education in Benue State – Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Research and Method in Education (IOSR-JRME). Vol. 1 Issue 6. Tahun 2013. (pp. 3811-3813).

Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, Second Edition. San Francisco: Longman.

Cakir, Ismail. The Use of Video as an Audio-Visual Material in Foreign Language Teaching Classroom. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET). Vol.

Daniel, Jemima. Audio-Visual Aids in Teaching of English. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology (IJIRSET). Vol 2 Issue 8 2013

Garrand, Tomothy. 2006. Writing for Multimedia and the Web: A Practical Guide to Content Development for Interactive Media. USA: Focal Press.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2004. How to Teach Writing. UK: Pearson Education Limited

Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching. UK: Longman.

Hedge, Tricia. 2005. Writing Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Joseph Macwan, Hiral. Using Visual Aids as Authentic Material in ESL Classrooms. Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL). Vol 3 Issue 1 2015.

Kausar, Ghazala. Students’ Perspective of the Use of Audio visual Aids in Pakistan. International Islamic University. Pakistan. 2013.

Madhuri J. Naga. Use of Audio Visual Aids in Teaching and Speaking. Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL). Vol 1 Issue 3. Tahun 2013

Mathew George, Nalliveettil. A Study of Usefulness of Audio-Visual Aids in EFL Classroom: Implications for Effective Instruction. International Journal of Higher Education. Vol. 2 No. 2 2013.

Rijlaarsdam, Gert. 2005. Effective Learning and Teaching of Writing. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Ur, Penny. 1991. A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. UK: Cambridge University Press.